PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026American Philosophical Quarterly0 citations

Justice as Repair

View Full Paper
DFDaniel Fryer

Key Points

  • This analysis critiques the notion of viewing reparations as secondary to distributive justice and proposes an integrated approach.
  • Philosophical critique of existing political theories on justice and reparations.
  • Development of the concept of 'justice as repair' to challenge traditional views.
  • Exploration of how past injustices shape our understanding of perfect justice.
  • Demonstrates that past injustices hinder the realization of distributive justice ideals.
  • Argues for a redefined concept of justice that includes reparation as a core component.
  • Highlights the limitations of forward-looking approaches to justice in addressing historical context.

Abstract

Abstract One standard story in political philosophy says that reparation is best viewed as supplementary to an ahistorical project of distributive justice. Once we figure out the forward-looking ideal, the argument goes, we can then focus on the necessary reparative interventions to transition us to that ideal state. I argue that this approach is mistaken. Not only do past injustices present barriers to achieving the distributive ideal—they also alter our conception of what counts as perfect justice from a forward-looking standpoint. I offer an alternative approach—justice as repair—that views reparation as a fundamental ideal in the concept of justice and analyze the concept of justice from that perspective.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daniel Fryer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edae394a46254e215b587dhttps://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.63.2.04
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper