PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Surgery Today0 citationsOpen Access

Optimal patient selection beyond the current selection criteria for liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis

MOMasayuki OkunoTITakashi ItoKFKen Fukumitsu

Key Points

  • This review aims to enhance patient selection criteria for liver transplantation in cases of unresectable colorectal liver metastases.
  • Discusses current selection criteria and prognostic factors for liver transplantation.
  • Reviews novel eligibility markers not included in standard criteria, including metabolic tumor volume and ctDNA.
  • Highlights the importance of assessing perihepatic lymph nodes before transplantation.
  • Current prognostic factors include tumor burden and gene mutation profile, which predict outcomes.
  • New potential markers like metabolic tumor volume and ctDNA might improve selection efficacy.
  • Clinical validation through ongoing liver transplantation trials is required.

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Despite numerous reports of favorable overall survival following LT for CRLM by several high-volume transplant centers, recurrence-free survival remains far from satisfactory. Given the invasiveness of the procedure, the scarcity of deceased-donor organs, and the potential risks to living donors, optimal patient selection is crucial. Currently, several prognostic factors are used for selecting good candidates for LT for CRLM, including tumor burden, extrahepatic metastases, gene mutation profile, and response to chemotherapy. To this end, several scoring systems based on traditional prognostic factors have been proposed. This review also discusses the prognostic factors that are not incorporated into standard LT program criteria but may serve as novel eligibility markers to improve patient selection, including metabolic tumor volume assessed by PET/CT, ctDNA, and the presence of perihepatic lymph node metastases. Routine pathological assessment of perihepatic lymph nodes prior to LT may be especially warranted because a high liver tumor burden is correlated with an increased incidence of perihepatic lymph node metastases. Further clinical studies and results from ongoing LT trials are needed to validate the clinical utility of these proposed prognostic factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okuno et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefc6dfede9185760d37a1https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03297-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper