PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026The Korean Journal of International Studies0 citationsOpen Access

Chinese Development Finance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Political Regimes and the Heterogeneous Environmental Effects

YLYunling LISYSeong Hun YOO

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how the political regime of recipient countries influences the environmental impact of Chinese development finance on greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Analyzed cross-national panel data from 118 developing countries between 2001 and 2022
  • Examined the relationship between Chinese development finance and greenhouse gas emissions in different political contexts
  • Assessed the role of democracy and authoritarianism in determining environmental outcomes
  • In authoritarian contexts, Chinese development finance is associated with higher greenhouse gas emissions due to weaker institutional checks
  • In democratic regimes, adverse environmental impacts from Chinese finance are significantly reduced
  • Highlights that the environmental effects of Chinese aid vary based on the political institutions of recipient countries

Abstract

This study examines the environmental consequences of Chinese development finance.Despite the growing volume of studies on the economic and political determinants of Chinese aid, relatively little attention has been paid to its environmental consequences.Given that Chinese development finance typically lacks the strict environmental conditionality characteristic of Western aid, we argue that the recipient's domestic political institutions-specifically the level of democracy-serve as the primary filter determining the environmental sustainability of these projects.Using cross-national panel data covering 118 developing countries from 2001 to 2022, we show that Chinese development finance does not exert a uniform effect on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across all recipient countries.Rather, its association with higher emissions is concentrated primarily in authoritarian contexts, where institutional checks on environmentally harmful projects are weaker.In democratic regimes, by contrast, such adverse environmental effects are substantially mitigated.These findings underscore the conditional nature of Chinese aid's environmental impact and highlight the importance of domestic political institutions in shaping whether external finance contributes to environmental degradation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

LI et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefcf4fede9185760d3ad4https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2026.04.24.1.155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper