PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Journal of Career Development0 citationsOpen Access

Bounded Rationality in Career Choices: How Cognitive Biases Appear in Adolescent Career Exploration

View Full Paper
GSGhassani SwaryandiniGBGeetanjali BasarkodCNClarence Ng

Key Points

  • To investigate how cognitive biases influence career decision-making in adolescents.
  • Mixed-methods study involving 21 Australian high school students aged 15-18.
  • Semi-structured interviews to explore decision-making approaches.
  • Quantitative survey to assess cognitive bias tendencies.
  • Confirmation bias observed as selective information seeking among students.
  • Availability bias shown in a preference for careers familiar to students.
  • Variations in confidence levels and sunk-cost fallacy identified in decision-making processes.

Abstract

Adolescents face high-stakes career decisions under uncertainty. Yet, while bounded rationality research has established that cognitive biases can systematically distort human judgement and decision-making, we know little about how these biases appear in adolescent career exploration. This pragmatic, mixed-methods study investigated how cognitive biases appear in career decision-making among 21 Australian high school students aged 15–18. Students participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their career decision-making approaches, followed by a quantitative survey assessing bias tendencies. Content analysis revealed several cognitive bias patterns: confirmation bias appeared as selective information seeking, availability bias emerged as choosing familiar careers, and varying levels of confidence and sunk-cost fallacy were observed. These findings highlight how biased thinking patterns can appear in adolescent career choices while acknowledging their potential benefits and limitations. Schools may benefit from incorporating bias-awareness activities into career education programs and teaching structured decision-making frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swaryandini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefcf4fede9185760d3c66https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453261444268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Why do different people choose different university degrees? Motivation and the choice of degree2014 · 102 citations
  2. 2I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice2021 · 38 citations
  3. 3Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: An Example from Collaborative Problem-Solving Discourse Data2023 · 55 citations
  4. 4Emerging Between Two Worlds2017 · 24 citations
  5. 5Flawed Self-Assessment2004 · 1,880 citations