PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026BMC Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Strengthening tobacco control enforcement in Nigeria: a policy and regulatory analysis supporting an expanded mandate for NAFDAC

SSSaifuddeen Kamfut SaniRMRametu MomoduAUAbbas Bashir Umar

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze Nigeria's tobacco control policies and recommend regulatory improvements to enhance enforcement capacity.
  • Conducted a desk-based qualitative analysis using comparative legal mapping against WHO FCTC obligations.
  • Performed thematic synthesis of WHO guidance and peer-reviewed evidence regarding tobacco regulation.
  • Conducted an implementation-readiness assessment of NAFDAC's capacity for tobacco regulation.
  • Identified five structural gaps in Nigeria's tobacco control: fragmented authority, lack of a central regulator, weak illicit trade controls, inadequate protection from industry interference, and regulatory gaps for nicotine products.
  • NAFDAC's existing capacity could be leveraged to centralize tobacco regulation while maintaining health policy oversight with the Federal Ministry of Health.
  • Proposed reconfiguration offers a feasible approach to enhance compliance with international treaty obligations and reduce tobacco-related harms.

Abstract

Nigeria has adopted comprehensive tobacco control legislation, including the National Tobacco Control Act (NTCA) 2015 and Tobacco Control Regulations 2019, yet continues to experience high tobacco-related morbidity and a substantial illicit cigarette market. Institutional fragmentation and weak enforcement capacity, compounded by evolving obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, undermine effective implementation. A desk-based qualitative policy and regulatory analysis was conducted using three complementary approaches: (1) comparative legal mapping of Nigeria’s tobacco control framework against core WHO FCTC and Illicit Trade Protocol obligations; (2) thematic synthesis of WHO guidance, treaty decisions, and peer-reviewed evidence on institutional arrangements for tobacco regulation; and (3) an implementation-readiness assessment of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) across key capacity domains. The analysis identified five interrelated structural gaps: fragmented institutional authority; absence of a central product regulator; weak supply-chain and illicit trade control; inadequate protection from tobacco industry interference; and a regulatory vacuum for emerging nicotine products. Nigeria’s current ministry-led configuration constrains compliance with WHO FCTC Articles 9, 10, 11, and 15, while NAFDAC already possesses significant laboratory, port-of-entry, and digital traceability capacity developed through pharmaceutical regulation. Reconfiguring Nigeria’s tobacco control architecture to assign NAFDAC a central technical regulatory mandate, while retaining health policy stewardship within the Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH), offers a legally feasible and context-appropriate pathway to strengthen enforcement, meet evolving treaty expectations, and reduce tobacco-related harms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3d19https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27589-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Health Risks Associated with Tobacco Consumption in Humans: An Overview2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Analyzing big tobacco’s global youth marketing strategies and factors influencing smoking initiation by Nigeria youths using the theory of triadic influence2020 · 33 citations
  3. 3Mapping the existing body of health policy implementation research in lower income settings: what is covered and what are the gaps?2014 · 82 citations
  4. 4Validation of an e-health readiness assessment framework for developing countries2020 · 60 citations
  5. 5Governance and policy capacity in health development and implementation in Australia2015 · 41 citations