PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Expert Systems with Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Traffic collision analysis and traffic flow simulation in toronto using cellular automata models

View Full Paper
MBMounika BoddepalliEREnayat RajabiSASaman Hassanzadeh Amin

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a framework that combines machine learning with Cellular Automata to model traffic collision risk and simulate congestion.
  • Integrated exploratory spatial analysis with supervised machine learning to identify high-risk areas and timings.
  • Utilized Random Forest and XGBoost for injury severity prediction on a dataset of over 500,000 collision records.
  • Employed a Toronto-calibrated Cellular Automata model to simulate congestion dynamics under varying conditions.
  • Achieved 83% accuracy in predicting injury severity, with an F1-score of 0.79 and AUROC of 0.86.
  • The CA simulation replicated observed congestion patterns with 88% spatial–temporal agreement.
  • Results support proactive traffic interventions aligned with Vision Zero objectives.

Abstract

Traffic collisions present a persistent public safety and congestion challenge in large urban environments such as Toronto. Existing studies often rely either on predictive machine learning models that lack downstream traffic interpretation or on traffic simulation frameworks that depend on static assumptions. This study introduces a novel integration of machine learning–based risk prediction with Cellular Automata simulation to dynamically model congestion propagation under high-risk conditions. This study addresses this gap by proposing an integrated framework combining exploratory spatial analysis, supervised machine learning, and an adaptive Cellular Automata (CA) traffic simulation to model collision risk and congestion under high-risk conditions. Using over 500,000 geo-referenced police-reported collision records from the City of Toronto, spatial analysis identifies high-risk zones, including the downtown core and Scarborough, and peak collision periods during morning and evening rush hours. Random Forest and XGBoost models are used to predict injury severity, achieving 83% accuracy, an F1-score of 0.79, and an AUROC of 0.86, outperforming linear baseline models. The predicted risk outputs are integrated as dynamic inputs into a Toronto-calibrated CA model to simulate congestion propagation under adverse weather, visibility, and behavioral conditions. The simulation reproduces observed congestion patterns with 88% spatial–temporal agreement. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining predictive analytics with simulation-based modeling to support data-driven urban traffic safety planning. The proposed framework supports proactive traffic safety interventions aligned with the City of Toronto’s Vision Zero objectives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boddepalli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3d92https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132538
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modeling and Forecasting Vehicular Traffic Flow as a Seasonal ARIMA Process: Theoretical Basis and Empirical Results2003 · 2,169 citations
  2. 2Lessons learnt from roadside collisions: A Canadian police perspective2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Time-series forecasting of seasonal items sales using machine learning – A comparative analysis2022 · 212 citations
  4. 4Hotspot Location Identification Using Accident Data, Traffic and Geometric Characteristics2019 · 17 citations
  5. 5Enhancing road safety with machine learning: Current advances and future directions in accident prediction using non-visual data2024 · 25 citations