PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Theory of Evolution of Cognitive Systems

View Full Paper
BVBoris VahutinskijKKI

Key Points

  • This work aims to create a formal model explaining the evolution of cognitive systems through the dynamics of architectures.
  • Developed a conceptual model analyzing cognitive architectures as fundamental units.
  • Constructed dynamical equations from minimal assumptions to understand selection and innovation processes.
  • Defined regime transitions in system organization using phase parameters to interpret behavior.
  • Identified qualitative predictions regarding cognitive evolution such as selective concentration and innovation emergence.
  • Showed that structural tension accumulates leading to transitions in cognitive architectures.
  • Described potential crises in cognitive systems linked to variability and selection dynamics.

Abstract

This work develops a formal conceptual model of the evolution of cognitive systems. It treats cognitive architectures as the fundamental units of analysis, distributed within a space of architectures endowed with a probability measure. Such architectures are realized across multiple levels—from individual cognitive systems (as carriers) to collective forms of organization, including science, culture, and institutional structures. Within this space, architectures evolve through selection, reproduction, and innovation, governed by replicator-type dynamics. The model is constructed from a minimal set of assumptions that give rise to a system of dynamical equations and macroscopic observables. In particular, the theory introduces variability (defined as the entropy of the distribution), integration (capturing structural coupling between architectures), and tension, defined as T = I · Φ where (Φ) measures structural incompatibility. These variables provide a link between micro-level selection dynamics and large-scale structural behavior. Phase parameters (Λ) and (Γ) define regimes of system organization, including integrated polymorphism, monoculture, fragmentation, and collapse. Transitions between these regimes are interpreted as architectural phase transitions driven by the accumulation of structural tension under conditions of sufficient variability and selection. The proposed model yields a set of qualitative predictions regarding cognitive evolution, including selective concentration, the reduction of polymorphism, the emergence of innovations at structural boundaries, and recurrent crisis dynamics. By combining selection dynamics with phase-based descriptions of large-scale structure, the theory provides a unified perspective on the evolution of knowledge systems and complex cognitive organizations. Disclosure of AI assistance This work was developed with the assistance of AI language models. The author contributed the core concepts, structure, and critical revision.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vahutinskij et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3df1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19765796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phase Transitions in Early Ontogenesis: From Pre-Architectural Organization to Cognitive Architectures2026
  2. 2Cognitive Evolution Beyond the Single Life Cycle2026
  3. 3Cognitive Development in Artificial Agents: A Theoretical Proposal2025
  4. 4Hybrid Evolution. The Epistemic Coprocessor Concept - Architecture of Symbiotic Intelligence2025
  5. 5Comparing cognition across major transitions using the hierarchy of formal automata2024 · 1 citations