Who truly owns a real estate property when contractual restrictions limit the transferee’s rights? In real estate and construction development projects, parties sometimes agree to voluntary contractual limitations on ownership, allowing the transferor (developer or original owner) to retain residual control even after transferring the property. Such arrangements can create significant legal uncertainty when creditors, subcontractors, or financial institutions rely on the property as security for financing or performance. This paper examines the operation and enforceability of contractual restrictions on real estate ownership rights in the context of construction and development disputes, drawing on comparative insights from Egyptian, French, and Palestinian legislation. The analysis demonstrates that while certain legal systems recognize the validity of such restrictions, most lack explicit statutory provisions and instead rely on judicial interpretation, resulting in unpredictability in enforcement—particularly when ownership is transferred to third parties. The study concludes that legislative clarification is necessary to establish uniform registration requirements and enhance legal protection for all stakeholders. By addressing these gaps, the paper highlights the legal and practical risks that ownership limitations pose for dispute resolution in construction and real estate development projects of a mixed nature between civil and commercial parties.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Enas Mohammed AlQodsi
Iyad Mohammad Jadalhaq
Mohammed El Hadi El Maknouzi
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
United Arab Emirates University
University of Sharjah
Mohammed V University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
AlQodsi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd43fede9185760d3e70 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1538