PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Neurorehabilitation and neural repair0 citationsOpen Access

Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study

View Full Paper
CMCecilia MezaRHRoberto S. HernandezSCSilvana L. Costa

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to determine how different RehaCom training modules impact cognitive improvement and which baseline participant factors influence responsiveness.
  • 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules.
  • Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT.
  • Correlation and regression analyses evaluated the relationship between module progression and cognitive outcomes.
  • Progression in 4 RehaCom modules significantly correlated with SDMT improvement, strongest in Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P < .001).
  • Higher baseline SDMT and greater module progression were associated with better 12-week SDMT performance (adjusted R² = .73).
  • At 6 months, older age, female sex, and progression in specific modules also predicted superior SDMT performance (adjusted R² = .71).

Abstract

BackgroundRehaCom, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation program for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), has been studied primarily in relation to treatment "dose" (duration, frequency, and adherence), with less focus on which training modules drive improvement or which participant factors predict responsiveness. This secondary analysis of the CogEx trial investigated whether progression within specific RehaCom modules was associated with processing speed improvement, measured by the SDMT, and whether baseline characteristics predicted response in participants with progressive MS.MethodsA total of 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules. Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated associations between module progression and cognitive outcomes.ResultsProgression correlated significantly with SDMT improvement in 4 modules, with the strongest effects for Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P r = .36, P R2 = .73). At 6 months, higher baseline SDMT, greater progression in Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance (adjusted R2 = .71).ConclusionProcessing speed gains in progressive MS were related to both module-specific progression and participant characteristics, supporting a precision approach to cognitive rehabilitation that tailors training content to individual cognitive profiles. This study is a secondary analysis of the CogEx trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03679468; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679468).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefdd1fede9185760d493ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261432556
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper