PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Array4 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Reinforcement Learning: A Tripartite Framework of Environment Design, Algorithmic Innovation, and Application Scenarios

View Full Paper
YLYingli LiuZXZheng XiongLYLing Yang

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the interactions among environment modeling, algorithm selection, and real-world deployment challenges in reinforcement learning.
  • Proposes a tripartite framework comprising environment design, algorithmic innovation, and application scenarios.
  • Analyzes learning stability influenced by factors like feature distribution and reward mechanisms.
  • Compares various algorithm frameworks including value-based and Actor–Critic methods.
  • Identifies key challenges in reinforcement learning applications such as decision-making and feedback issues.
  • Discusses potential solutions like world models and safe reinforcement learning strategies.
  • Summarizes the common patterns and evaluation metrics in diverse application fields.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is gradually shifting from a research paradigm dominated by games and simulations toward real complex scenarios with high safety requirements and high costs, such as energy systems, industrial control, robotics, medical decision-making, and AI assistants. However, existing surveys are mostly centered on algorithms or applications, lacking a systematic analysis of the interactions among environment modeling, algorithm selection, and real deployment constraints. This paper proposes a ternary collaborative framework composed of environment design, algorithmic innovation, and application scenarios, to systematically sort out the development path of reinforcement learning. From the environment design dimension, it focuses on analyzing the influence of feature distribution, reward mechanism, dynamic uncertainty, and scalability on learning stability and generalization ability; from the algorithm dimension, it compares value-based, policy-based, model-based, and Actor–Critic frameworks as well as representative methods in recent years, emphasizing the trade-off among stability, sample efficiency, and deployability; from the application dimension, it summarizes the common design patterns, evaluation metrics, and key challenges of reinforcement learning in fields such as games, robotics and autonomous driving, energy systems and smart grids, industrial process control, healthcare, and AI assistants. It further summarizes cross-domain problems such as high-dimensional decision-making, sparse and delayed feedback, parameter sensitivity, and long-term credit assignment, and discusses potential solution directions such as world models, safe and constrained reinforcement learning, offline reinforcement learning, and integration with large language models. This paper aims to provide a unified analytical perspective and practical reference for the engineering implementation of reinforcement learning in real complex systems, in order to support engineering implementation in real complex systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefe1efede9185760d4c88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2026.100812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper