PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026European Heart Journal451 citationsOpen Access

Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014

View Full Paper
KSKarolina SzummerLWLars WallentinLLLars Lindhagen

Key Result

Gradual implementation of evidence-based treatments in STEMI patients over 20 years was associated with a decrease in 1-year mortality from 22.1% to 14.1%.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=105,674)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the implementation of evidence-based treatments over 20 years improve survival and reduce recurrent ischemic events in patients with STEMI?

P
Population
105,674 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registered in the nation-wide SWEDEHEART registry between 1995 and 2014.
I
Intervention
Implementation of evidence-based treatments over time (including reperfusion, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, dual antiplatelet therapy, statins, beta-blockers, and ACEi/ARBs).
C
Comparator
Historical practice (earlier years of the registry, e.g., 1995).
O
Outcome
Fatal and non-fatal outcomes including 1-year mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure.hard clinical

The gradual implementation of evidence-based treatments for STEMI over 20 years is strongly associated with improved survival and reduced recurrent ischemic events.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 14.1% vs 22.1%

Abstract

AIMS: Impact of changes of treatments on outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in real-life health care has not been documented. METHODS AND RESULTS: All STEMI cases (n = 105.674) registered in the nation-wide SWEDEHEART registry between 1995 and 2014 were included and followed for fatal and non-fatal outcomes for up to 20 years. Most changes in treatment and outcomes occurred from 1994 to 2008. Evidence-based treatments increased: reperfusion from 66.2 to 81.7%; primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 4.5 to 78.0%; dual antiplatelet therapy from 0 to 89.6%; statin: 14.1 to 93.6%; beta-blocker: 78.2 to 91.0%, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme/angiotensin-2-receptor inhibitors: 40.8 to 85.2% (P-value for-trend <0.001 for all). One-year mortality decreased from 22.1 to 14.1%. Standardized incidence ratio compared with the general population decreased from 5.54 to 3.74 (P < 0.001). Cardiovascular (CV) death decreased from 20.1 to 11.1%, myocardial infarction (MI) from 11.5 to 5.8%; stroke from 2.9 to 2.1%; heart failure from 7.1 to 6.2%. After standardization for differences in demography and baseline characteristics, the change of 1-year CV-death or MI corresponded to a linear trend of 0.915 (95% confidence interval: 0.906-0.923) per 2-year period which no longer was significant, 0.997 (0.984-1.009), after adjustment for changes in treatment. The changes in treatment and outcomes were most pronounced from 1994 to 2008. CONCLUSION: Gradual implementation of new and established evidence-based treatments in STEMI patients during the last 20 years has been associated with prolonged survival and lower risk of recurrent ischaemic events, although a plateauing is seen since around 2008.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szummer et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=105,674). Implementation of evidence-based treatments vs. Historical practice (1995 vs 2014) was evaluated on 1-year mortality. Gradual implementation of evidence-based treatments in STEMI patients over 20 years was associated with a decrease in 1-year mortality from 22.1% to 14.1%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f12445d0e13c1ffb21bd23https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx515
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper