PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering0 citations

Analytical models for load and warping in kinematic bending with partial heating of profiles with arbitrary asymmetric cross-section

View Full Paper
EHEike HoffmannRGRobin GitschelATA. Erman Tekkaya

Key Points

  • To generalize an analytical model for predicting warping and shear center movement in asymmetric bending of profiles.
  • Adapted analytical model applied to L-shaped and U-shaped profiles.
  • Implemented adjustments for strain-free fiber and force calculations.
  • Errors in bending load prediction and warping assessed through numerical and experimental data.
  • Reduced prediction error for bending load from 30% to 4%.
  • Lowered warping prediction error from 46% to 6%.
  • Successfully modeled shear center movement in relation to partial heating strategies.

Abstract

Abstract The difference between the position of the load axis and the shear center leads to warping in asymmetric bending of profiles. In a previous study partial heating during bending was proposed to reduce warping. This work did prove the reduction of warping for an L-shaped cross-section using experimental and numerical data and an analytical model for the description of the bending moment and profile warping was created. However, the analytical model was not able to describe the movement of the shear center position and was restricted to the description of L-profiles. The present work generalizes the previous analytical model to describe the movement of the shear center position due to the heating strategy for any cross-section. Additionally, descriptions for strain free fiber, force calculation and warping have been adjusted to achieve high accuracy when modeling arbitrary profile cross-sections. The analysis is carried out on the example of L- and U-shaped profiles consisting of S500MC fine grain steel. Using the adjusted model, the error in the prediction of bending load has been reduced from 30 % to 4 % and for warping the error changes from 46 % to 6 %. The reason for the deviation can be attributed to less simplified force and strain free fiber calculations as well as a simplification approach of bending angle by linearization. A formulation for the shear center movement has been successfully implemented, showing that the shear center moves in the direction of the load axis with the analyzed partial heating strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154a4879cb923c4944e48https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071763
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental and Numerical Methodology for Assessing the Bending Behaviour of Thin-Walled Steel Angle Members: A Representative Case Study2026
  2. 2Behavior of steel beam section under warping using BIM program2024
  3. 3A general solution for torsion-induced warping in helical curved elements with non-circular solid section: Theory and application to compression springs stiffness2026
  4. 4A rapid and precise approach to predicting the cure‐induced warping of T‐shaped composite parts with inconsistent layup2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Path‐following strategies for nonlinear analysis of steel‐concrete composite cross‐sections: a bi‐axial bending evaluation2025