PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of drainage system defects using co-occurrence patterns

View Full Paper
DADramani ArimiyawTZTarek ZayedJYJie Yang

Key Points

  • The study aims to uncover defect co-occurrence patterns in urban drainage systems using network science.
  • Developed a network science framework using CCTV inspection data from Hong Kong's drainage network.
  • Constructed weighted defect co-occurrence networks and applied Louvain clustering algorithms.
  • Validated clustering consistency with multiple weighting schemes and computed the Adjusted Rand Index.
  • Identified four distinct deterioration mechanisms with varying prevalence in the drainage system.
  • Statistical analysis showed significant associations between mechanisms and infrastructure characteristics.
  • Findings support the transition to mechanism-informed management strategies for targeted interventions.

Abstract

Urban drainage systems face unprecedented challenges from ageing infrastructure, environmental stressors, and increasing service demands. Traditional condition assessment approaches aggregate diverse defect patterns into single condition scores, obscuring the underlying deterioration mechanisms that drive failure processes. This study develops a network science framework to identify systematic defect co-occurrence patterns using CCTV inspection data from Hong Kong’s drainage network. Constructing weighted defect co-occurrence networks and applying Louvain clustering algorithms, we identified four distinct deterioration mechanisms: Lining-Deformation Co-occurrence Pattern (18.4% prevalence), Structural-Hydraulic Co-occurrence Pattern (54.5%), Root-Joint Co-occurrence Pattern (22.3%), and Connection-Sediment Co-occurrence Pattern (4.9%). Multi-method validation using five alternative weighting schemes demonstrated robust clustering consistency (Adjusted Rand Index = 0.438–1.000), while statistical analysis revealed significant associations between mechanisms and infrastructure characteristics (diameter, age, material) and contextual factors (district, land use, traffic intensity). These findings support the development of mechanism-informed management strategies, enabling utilities to move from purely reactive condition-based approaches toward targeted interventions informed by systematic defect association patterns. While cross-sectional analysis cannot establish causal relationships, the observed co-occurrence patterns provide actionable intelligence for risk-based asset management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arimiyaw et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154e0879cb923c4945140https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2026.107708
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper