PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Community Development Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Pyotr before Paulo: ‘caring about the humanitarian side of our education’

View Full Paper
RCRay Di Marco Campbell

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the connections between Kropotkin and Freire in the context of educational reform.
  • Examined Kropotkin's article regarding geography and its implications for education.
  • Analyzed the theoretical foundations laid by Kropotkin for Freire's pedagogy.
  • Identified parallels in thought processes between Kropotkin and Freire regarding critical consciousness.
  • Kropotkin's views provide insights into liberation-oriented pedagogy.
  • Geography is positioned as a central discipline in fostering critical engagement in education.
  • The exploration emphasizes the relevance of Kropotkin's theories in contemporary discussions about pedagogy.

Abstract

Abstract This contribution explores the parallel thought processes of the Russian anarchist Pyotr Kropotkin (1842–1921), and the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire (1921–1997) concerning radical reform to educational practice, asking whether the former deserves space in academic study of liberation-oriented pedagogies. Specifically, it examines Kropotkin’s advocacy of fostering critical consciousness, albeit not in the same terms, in his 1885 article, What Geography Ought to Be, and demonstrates the ways that this renowned anarchist laid the theoretical foundations for Freire and others to build on some eight decades prior to Freire’s (1968) most celebrated text, known in English as Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Although centred on geography, Kropotkin (1885, p. 940) posits the field as core to broader ‘hard’ and ‘social’ science (‘Biology, Climatology, Anthropology, and Comparative Ethnography’ among them), stating that by engaging in critical praxis of any kind, a given actor ‘shows their mutual action and consequences with regard to the superficies of the globe’. Whether the intended outcome or not, by interacting with the world, he believed that none of us ‘could … remain an outsider to the general scientific movement’ (ibid.). Consequently, geography in its breadth permits what he believed to be an accessible entry point to a deep dialogue on pedagogy, wider educational discourse, critical reflection on the purpose of learning, and exploration of the socio-political systems that govern our lives when we permit them to.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ray Di Marco Campbell (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154e0879cb923c4945398https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsag012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper