PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres0 citations

On the Changes in the Connection Between SSWs and Surface Extreme Weather in Response to an Abrupt 4xCO 2 Increase

View Full Paper
DMD. De MaeseneireBAB. AyarzagüenaNCN. Calvo

Key Points

  • This study examines how the relationship between sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) and surface extreme weather changes with quadrupled CO2 levels.
  • Evaluated CMIP6 models to analyze changes in SSW frequency under 4xCO2 conditions.
  • Classified models into two subsets based on SSW frequency changes: NEG (decreasing) and POS (increasing).
  • Assessed impacts on surface weather, particularly cold spells in regions like Scandinavia and Siberia.
  • NEG models predict a strengthened polar vortex and longer, more intense cold spells under 4xCO2.
  • Higher probability of SSW-related cold spells over Scandinavia with increased cold spell duration noted in NEG models.
  • Warm extreme events over Greenland appear less influenced by SSW changes under increased CO2.

Abstract

Abstract Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are the most important variability phenomena of the wintertime polar stratosphere. SSWs impact tropospheric circulation and surface temperature, even influencing the occurrence of surface extreme events. Still, there is a lack of consensus on how SSWs will change in the future. In this study, we investigate how the SSW impacts on temperature surface extreme events are affected by an abrupt quadrupling of CO 2 , compared to pre‐industrial conditions, in CMIP6 models. We analyze two subsets of models regarding their changes in SSWs frequency in response to 4xCO 2 (models with decreasing SSWs frequency (NEG), and models with an increase frequency (POS)). Under 4xCO 2 conditions, NEG models project a strengthened polar vortex, have more persistent SSW signals in the lower stratosphere and have larger surface impacts than POS models. NEG models also show a higher probability of days affected by SSW‐related cold spells under a 4xCO 2 increase with longer cold spells over Scandinavia (and to a lesser extent, Siberia). This would be related to the larger persistence of the SSW signal in the lower stratosphere and the intensified stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in response to 4xCO 2 in this group of models. SSWs seem to have less influence on warm extreme events over Greenland and so, they are not affected by changes in the downward coupling after SSWs under a 4xCO 2 increase. These results improve the current understanding of how the stratosphere‐troposphere coupling is modified under 4xCO 2 conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maeseneire et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f19f9cedf4b46824806532https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd045140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Northern Hemisphere Stratosphere‐Troposphere Circulation Change in CMIP6 Models: 2. Mechanisms and Sources of the Spread2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate2019 · 987 citations
  3. 3Testing the Ratio of Two Poisson Rates2008 · 115 citations
  4. 4Stratospheric Influence on the Development of the 2018 Late Winter European Cold Air Outbreak2022 · 23 citations
  5. 5Uncertainty in the Response of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations in CMIP6 Models2020 · 113 citations