PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Mass Gap for 4D SU(N) Yang–Mills Theory via Center-Vortex Percolation and Balaban Renormalization Group

View Full Paper
ZFZoltan B Feher

Key Points

  • This research aims to prove the existence of a mass gap in four-dimensional SU(N) Yang–Mills theory for N ≥ 2.
  • Established a center-vortex percolation seed using local center-event mixing (MIX route).
  • Converted supercritical percolation into an area law for Wilson loops via coarse-plaquette dephasing.
  • Applied Balaban renormalization group to transport the lattice theory to a continuum Euclidean Schwinger family.
  • Confirmed existence of a positive mass gap Δ > 0 for the four-dimensional SU(N) Yang–Mills theory.
  • Achieved a certified suppression margin Ω_G ≥ 2.01 × 10⁻⁴, indicating strong coupling behavior.
  • Demonstrated that the resulting self-adjoint Hamiltonian satisfies H ≥ m_ξ/ξ > 0.

Abstract

We prove that four-dimensional SU (N) Yang–Mills theory, N ≥ 2, has a mass gap Δ > 0. The proof proceeds in four stages. At strong coupling, a center-vortex percolation seed is established via a local center-event mixing argument (MIX route), with an explicit finite-energy lower bound that renders the Liggett–Schonmann–Stacey domination hypothesis checkable. Supercritical percolation is converted to an area law for Wilson loops by a coarse-plaquette dephasing argument. The lattice theory is transported to a continuum Euclidean Schwinger family via a Balaban renormalization group sequence, with a certified suppression margin ΩG ≥ 2. 01 × 10⁻⁴ controlling the KP mixing entry. Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction applied to the limit theory yields a Hilbert space with a self-adjoint Hamiltonian satisfying H ≥ m_ξ/ξ > 0. All principal steps are proved in this paper; the five imported facts are standard and explicitly stated in Appendix B.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zoltan B Feher (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f19f9cedf4b468248065c4https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19820503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper