PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering0 citations

Performance evaluation of crossflow, pilot‐scale GUNT ‐ CE530 reverse osmosis desalination system

View Full Paper
OAOlalere Olusegun AbayomiPBPeter BernaskoJGJacob Gristock

Key Points

  • Evaluate the performance of the GUNT-CE530 reverse osmosis desalination system under varying salinity levels.
  • Pilot-scale system was tested using simulated seawater with salinity of 0.83 to 5.0 g/L.
  • Operational parameters like permeate flux, retentate flow rate, and salt rejection were monitored for 60 minutes.
  • Conductivity readings monitored under varying salt loads and pressure conditions.
  • Initial permeate flux decreased from 0.607 L/m² min to 0.22 L/m² min due to membrane fouling.
  • Salt rejection remained high at 92.41%–99.90% for stable conditions at 30 bar pressure.
  • Slight decline in salt rejection (98.5%–98.7%) observed at higher salt loads, with pressure dropping to ~16 bar.

Abstract

Abstract Reverse osmosis (RO) is a vital separation technique used to remove dissolved salts from seawater and treat wastewater, based on the application of hydraulic pressure. This study evaluates the performance of the GUNT‐CE530 RO system using simulated seawater with salinity ranging from 0.83 to 5.0 g/L. Key operational parameters, viz.: permeate flux, retentate flow rate, and salt rejection, were monitored for 60 min. The initial permeate flux of 0.607 L/m 2 min declined to 0.22 L/m 2 min due to membrane fouling and pressure fluctuations. Despite this, salt rejection consistently remained high (92.41%–99.90%) throughout the desalination process, with complete rejection observed up to 200 g salt addition (0–40 min) under a stable 30 bar pressure. At higher salt loads (250–300 g), rejection declined slightly to 98.5%–98.7% as the pressure difference dropped to ~16 bar and permeate conductivity rose to 0.1 mS/cm. This indicates strong membrane performance under moderate salinity, with minor efficiency loss at elevated concentrations likely due to increased osmotic pressure and concentration polarization. While experimental limitations affected precise conductivity readings, the membrane exhibited consistently high salt rejection across a range of concentrations, confirming its effectiveness for brackish and seawater purification. These data underscore the need for stable pressure control, real‐time monitoring, and anti‐fouling strategies to sustain membrane efficiency and prolong system lifespan.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abayomi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a42a8c0f03fd67763363https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper