PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: Comparative Evaluation of Traditional and Molecular Methods

View Full Paper
RERahul EshiRPRahul PatilLTlaxmi Tadavi

Key Points

  • This review evaluates traditional and molecular methods for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB).
  • Comparative evaluation of laboratory diagnostic approaches for TB
  • Focus on traditional methods (sputum smear microscopy, culture, histopathology)
  • Analysis of advanced molecular techniques (CBNAAT, line probe assays, WGS)
  • Discussion of costs, sensitivity, and turnaround times of methods
  • Traditional methods have low sensitivity and are time-consuming.
  • Molecular techniques offer rapid and accurate detection, including drug resistance.
  • Integrated approaches combining both methods enhance diagnostic outcomes.

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains a major global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment, prevention of transmission, and control of drug-resistant strains. This review critically evaluates laboratory diagnostic approaches for TB, focusing on traditional methods such as sputum smear microscopy, culture techniques, and histopathology, alongside advanced molecular methods including cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification tests (CBNAAT), Truenat, line probe assays (LPA), and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Traditional methods, though cost-effective and widely accessible, are limited by low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround times. In contrast, molecular techniques provide rapid, sensitive, and specific detection, including early identification of drug resistance, which is crucial for managing multidrug-resistant TB. The review also explores the pathophysiology and morphology of TB, highlighting their relevance in diagnostic interpretation. Clinical features, complications, and laboratory monitoring strategies are discussed to emphasize the importance of integrated diagnostic approaches. The role of laboratory systems in treatment monitoring, public health surveillance, and prevention strategies is critically analyzed. Despite significant advancements, challenges such as cost, infrastructure requirements, and accessibility limit the widespread implementation of molecular diagnostics. Therefore, a combined approach integrating both traditional and molecular methods is essential to optimize diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on point-of-care technologies, biomarker discovery, and cost-effective diagnostic solutions to strengthen TB control programs globally.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eshi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4b78c0f03fd67763d3chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19843519
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper