ABSTRACT: The rise of remote work has challenged traditional performance appraisal systems, often amplifying biases due to limited visibility and subjective evaluations. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers potential for more objective, data-driven assessments. However, its application in unbiased appraisal of remote workers remains underexplored, necessitating a systematic review of existing literature. The study conducted a comprehensive literature review using targeted search terms across reputable databases including ACM, IEEE Xplore, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, and Scopus. A refined search strategy was developed after a pilot phase, incorporating terms like "artificial intelligence," "performance appraisal," and "remote work," along with related concepts such as "machine learning" and "telecommuting." This ensured a diverse and relevant selection of scholarly articles focused on AI's role in evaluating remote workers. Inclusion criteria required peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2013 and 2024. Ultimately, eight high-quality articles were chosen for analysis in the study. The study revealed that barriers to communication, subjective evaluation criteria, complexities in measuring productivity, and privacy concerns are challenges presented in appraising remote workers. The study's findings reveal that integrating artificial intelligence into performance appraisal procedures provides managers with tools to evaluate digital footprints, including work productivity, communication habits, and engagement levels, and enables instantaneous activity tracking and monitoring of remote workers. It was discovered that Artificial Intelligence could be developed to identify and adjust to cultural subtleties in interpersonal and job styles, making sure appraisals are fair and culturally receptive. The study concluded that AI algorithms and data analytics monitor and evaluate the performance of remote workers in real-time, deliver unbiased appraisal of the performance, provide personalized feedback and enhance communication. This study marks a turning point in how remote workers are evaluated, highlighting the growing role of AI in performance reviews. But to make this shift work fairly and transparently, clear laws and guidelines are needed. These should ensure AI tools are developed and used responsibly. The study suggests that policymakers should team-up with industry experts to create standards and best practices, helping AI-driven performance monitoring become both ethical and effective in the modern workplace.
Adepoju et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: