PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Processes1 citationsOpen Access

Mechanism of Water Invasion Zone Damage on Multi-Cycle CO2 Huff-n-Puff Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs

View Full Paper
FZFenglan Zhao陶陶丹凤SHShijun Huang

Key Points

  • This research investigates the impact of water invasion on CO2 huff-n-puff recovery in tight oil reservoirs.
  • Utilized tight cores with relative water invasion zone length
  • Employed a combination of injection, soaking, and production time designs
  • Conducted single-factor analysis using control variable method
  • Incorporated numerical simulation and nuclear magnetic resonance testing
  • Cumulative recovery factor reduced by 4.13 percentage points in water-invaded model after four cycles
  • Water invasion zone formed a barrier, hindering CO2 seepage
  • NMR T2 spectra showed distinct differences between water-free and water-invaded cores

Abstract

Tight oil reservoirs are characterized by poor petrophysical properties. After hydraulic fracturing, the low flowback rate of fracturing fluid readily leads to the formation of a water invasion zone in the near-wellbore region, which severely restricts the performance of Carbon dioxide (CO2) huff-n-puff. To clarify the damage mechanism of the water invasion zone on CO2 huff-n-puff in tight oil reservoirs and determine the key regulatory parameters, tight cores with a relative water invasion zone length Δδ = 0.3 were adopted as the research subject. Five groups of injection–soaking–production time combinations were designed, and single-factor analysis was implemented using the control variable method. Integrated with numerical simulation and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) testing, the influence of the water invasion zone, pore crude oil mobilization characteristics, and parameter regulation effects were systematically explored. The results demonstrate that the water invasion zone occupies effective pore throats to form a continuous water-phase barrier, hindering CO2 seepage and mass transfer. After four huff-n-puff cycles, the cumulative recovery factor of the water-invaded model is 4.13 percentage points lower than that of the water-free model. After four huff-n-puff cycles, the cumulative recovery factor of the water-invaded model is 4.13 percentage points lower than that of the water-free model. The NMR T2 spectra of cores with and without water invasion exhibit remarkable discrepancies: the water-free core presents a unimodal structure, while the water-invaded core features a distinctive bimodal structure, with obvious staged characteristics in crude oil mobilization. The recovery factor declines nonlinearly and sharply with the increase of Δδ, verifying that the water invasion zone length is the dominant controlling factor. The regulation effects of injection, soaking, and production time differ significantly: injection time serves as the pivotal parameter for enhancing oil recovery. Prolonging injection time can strengthen displacement intensity and dismantle the water-phase barrier, thereby elevating the recovery factor, whereas soaking time and production time have no significant improvement effect. The results can provide valuable references for the parameter optimization of CO2 huff-n-puff in water-invaded tight oil reservoirs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763e9ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/pr14091402
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper