PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Journal of Biomechanical Engineering0 citations

Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow

View Full Paper
MUMuhammad UsmanPCPeter CastilloANAkil Narayan

Key Points

  • To establish an uncertainty-aware framework improving computational fluid dynamics models for coronary arteries.
  • Integrated uncertainty quantification techniques in fluid dynamics models.
  • Fitted univariate probability distributions to hemodynamic parameters.
  • Applied sampled parameter ensembles to analytical and patient-specific models.
  • Identified velocity as the largest contributor (~79%) to wall shear stress variability.
  • Spatial medians in wall shear stress varied by ~50% due to parameter uncertainties.
  • First-order Sobol indices explained ~93% and ~99% of total WSS variance in analytical and patient-specific models, respectively.

Abstract

Abstract Computational fluid dynamics simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fit to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated to uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (~79%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ~50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (~59%) and velocity (~40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ~93% and ~99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Usman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763e9fhttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071773
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls2019 · 5 citations
  2. 2Multi-fidelity estimators for coronary circulation models under clinically-informed data uncertainty2019 · 2 citations
  3. 3MULTIFIDELITY ESTIMATORS FOR CORONARY CIRCULATION MODELS UNDER CLINICALLY INFORMED DATA UNCERTAINTY2020 · 21 citations
  4. 4Effects of Uncertainty of Outlet Boundary Conditions in a Patient-Specific Case of Aortic Coarctation2021 · 52 citations
  5. 5Personalized and uncertainty-aware coronary hemodynamics simulations: From Bayesian estimation to improved multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification2025 · 9 citations