PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026The Korean Journal of Orthodontics0 citationsOpen Access

Retention of orthodontic aligners with different gingival margin designs on three-dimensionally printed models representing varying degrees of marginal tissue recession

NBNatália Angela BortoliGBGuilherme Picolli BerndHBHélio Radke Bittencourt

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how different gingival margin designs affect the retention of orthodontic aligners on models with various levels of marginal tissue recession.
  • Evaluated models representing different classes of gingival recession (I, II, III, IV) and controls without alterations.
  • Fabricated aligners with scalloped, scalloped extended, and straight margins for each model.
  • Conducted pull-off tests using a universal testing machine to measure maximum dislodgement force.
  • The Class III model exhibited a significant retention value of 54.4 N, distinct from other models.
  • No significant difference in retention was found among Class I (25.6 N), Class II (33.2 N), and control (26.8 N) models.
  • Aligners with scalloped margins showed lower retention compared to scalloped-extended and straight margin designs.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of three gingival margin aligner designs positioned on models with varying severities of marginal tissue recession. Methods: Nine models were obtained for each marginal tissue ressection class (Classes I, II, III, and IV). Control models had no anatomical alterations. For each model, three aligners of each gingival margin designs were fabricated (scalloped, scalloped extended, and straight). The aligners were placed on the models, and a hook was positioned in the buccal region at the level of the mandibular first molars. Pull-off tests were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min, and the maximum dislodgement force (N) was recorded. Each aligner was removed 10 times, and the average value was obtained. Results: < 0.05). The Class III model (54.4 N) exhibited the second highest retention value, which was significantly different from the other models. There was no significant difference in retention among Class I (25.6 N), Class II (33.2 N), and control (26.8 N). Conclusions: Aligner retention increased with increasing severity of marginal tissue recession. Aligners with scalloped margins provided less retention than those with scalloped-extended and straight margins.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bortoli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0991e5f7920c6386bc3https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod25.269
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper