PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Anti-Trafficking Review0 citationsOpen Access

Twenty-Five More Years of CSR? How states are reinforcing private governance in the anti-forced labour governance arena

GLGenevieve LeBaron

Key Points

  • This research examines how recent government initiatives impact private governance in the context of forced labour prevention.
  • Analysis of government legislation and initiatives aimed at forced labour in supply chains.
  • Exploration of the role of private actors in governance frameworks.
  • Argument development regarding the sufficiency of current regulations.
  • Government measures have increased the power of private actors, such as auditing firms and certification bodies.
  • Current initiatives often reinforce rather than replace corporate social responsibility frameworks.
  • Without stricter regulations, future efforts may replicate past failures in combating forced labour.

Abstract

Within anti-forced labour circles, there has been considerable excitement lately about governments taking on a more active role in tackling forced labour in supply chains. A common perspective is that after over 25 years of failed corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts, governments have re-entered the arena; states’ enactment of responsive legislation (e.g. due diligence legislation or transparency legislation), import bans, and multi-lateral efforts, including through the G7, are often heralded as evidence of their stepping up. However, the extent to which this wave of government initiatives reinforces and relies upon, rather than replaces, CSR is frequently overlooked. In this article, I consider the ways in which recent government initiatives to tackle forced labour in supply chains expand the market, role, and governance power of unaccountable private actors, including auditing firms, data analytics and Artificial Intelligence companies, and certification bodies. I argue that unless governments enact far more ambitious regulation and restrictions on multinational enterprises, we are heading for another 25 years of deficient and inadequate private-led governance to address forced labour in supply chains.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Genevieve LeBaron (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0991e5f7920c6386bc4https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201226262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Governance of Global Supply Chains: Empirical Insights from the Ready-made Garment Industry in Bangladesh a Decade after Rana Plaza2026
  2. 2Beyond Compliance-Based Governance: The Role of Social Intermediaries in Mitigating Forced Labour in Global Supply Chains2024 · 23 citations
  3. 3Shifting the perspective on labor exploitation: Non‐commercial organizations' contribution toward supply chain governance2024 · 15 citations
  4. 4Greening the Workplace: Exploring the Influence of Corporate Sustainability Governance on Corporate Labour Rights in the Case of Indian Listed Companies for the Period of 2010 to 20212024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Building responsible and sustainable supply chain frameworks: limits of international investment law and the CSR initiatives taken by the EU and China2024 · 4 citations