PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Energy Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Integrated waste heat and cold energy recovery using Organic Rankine Cycles for a Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) process

View Full Paper
ASAlireza ShamsSESaeed EiniYCYuqiu Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions in the DRI process by integrating waste heat and cold energy recovery.
  • Developed and optimized four Organic Rankine Cycle configurations: Basic, Internal Heat Exchanger, Regenerative, and Dual Fluid.
  • Screened working fluids based on stringent environmental and safety criteria.
  • Conducted Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis to assess design robustness.
  • The Dual Fluid configuration achieves the highest power output of 14.14 MW.
  • The Regenerative configuration offers the lowest Levelized Cost of Electricity at 5.22 c$/kWh.
  • All configurations demonstrated high robustness, indicated by narrow confidence intervals.

Abstract

The iron and steel industry, as one of the most energy-intensive sectors, faces growing challenges related to energy efficiency and carbon emissions. This study proposes an integrated energy recovery approach for a 1. 5 Mtpa Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) process by simultaneously utilizing waste heat from flue gases and cold energy from Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) regasification through Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems. LNG storage and regasification offer a reliable and flexible energy supply solution, enabling buffering against disruptions and supporting continuous operation. Four ORC configurations (Basic, internal heat exchanger, Regenerative, and Dual fluid) were modeled and optimized. The working fluid selection was guided by stringent environmental and safety criteria, narrowing an initial pool of refrigerants to viable candidates. Two optimization objectives were evaluated: maximizing net power output and minimizing the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). Results show that while the Dual fluid configuration achieves the highest power output (14. 14 MW), the Regenerative one offers the lowest LCOE (5. 22 c/kWh), striking a balance between efficiency and economic viability. To assess robustness, a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis was conducted, accounting for variations in turbine power output, pump consumption, heat exchanger areas, and operation and maintenance costs. The results revealed narrow confidence intervals across all configurations, indicating high robustness of the optimal designs. • Integrated ORC design recovers both waste heat and LNG cold energy in DRI process. • Four ORC configurations modeled and optimized for power and cost performance. • Working fluids screened by environmental and safety-related properties constraints. • Dual fluid configuration yields the highest output (14. 14 MW). • Regenerative configuration shows lowest LCOE (5. 22 c/kWh).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shams et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0991e5f7920c6386cf2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109352
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Design and 4E Analysis of a Hybrid Air Supply System for Blast Furnaces Driven by Excess Pressure and Waste Heat Recovery2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Decarbonizing the iron and steel industry: A systematic review of sociotechnical systems, technological innovations, and policy options2022 · 439 citations
  3. 3Developing group contribution models for the estimation of Atmospheric Lifetime and Minimum Ignition Energy2020 · 9 citations
  4. 4Thermal performance evaluation of subcritical organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery from sinter annular cooler2020 · 15 citations
  5. 5Determination of optimum organic Rankine cycle parameters and configuration for utilizing waste heat in the steel industry as a driver of receive osmosis system2021 · 14 citations