PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow0 citationsOpen Access

NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds numbers between 50,000 and 140,000 — Part 2: Oscillating streamwise flow

View Full Paper
TJT. JardinVFV. FerrandEGE.R. Gowree

Key Points

  • This study analyzes how varying unsteady freestream velocities influence lift response in a NACA0012 airfoil.
  • Conducted wind tunnel tests and high-fidelity numerical simulations.
  • Utilized unsteady thin airfoil theory to analyze the lift response.
  • Compared analytical modeling and experimental results to understand flow topology effects.
  • Lift response varied significantly with oscillating freestream conditions, correlating with laminar separation dynamics.
  • Analytical models predicting lift response without viscous effects often failed under unsteady conditions.
  • Viscous and inviscid approaches highlighted the importance of viscous effects on lift changes.

Abstract

In many engineering applications, lifting surfaces operate in the low Reynolds number regime where the flow is prone to laminar separation, transition and reattachment, leading to the formation, in the time-average sense, of a so-called laminar separation bubble (LSB). Under unsteady freestream conditions (e.g. gusts), the dynamics of the laminar separation bubble that forms on low Reynolds number airfoils may be significantly affected by unsteady effects (as opposed to quasi-steady effects discussed in the previous paper, part 1), thereby affecting aerodynamic loads. In this paper, we analyze the response in lift of a NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds number O ( 1 0 5 ) to varying freestream velocity through wind tunnel tests, high-fidelity numerical simulations and unsteady thin airfoil theory, and we correlate this response to first theoretical principles and the dynamics of the LSB. We show that analytical modeling, which does not account for viscous and streamwise pressure gradient effects, fails at predicting lift response when unsteady effects lead to separation without reattachment to separation with reattachment during the cycle. Accordingly, differences between viscous and inviscid approaches help reveal the role of viscous effects on lift response. • Lift response of a NACA0012 airfoil to oscillating freestream is investigated. • Results from analytical model, numerical simulations and experiments are compared. • Force partitioning method helps correlate lift response to changes in flow topology. • We explore regions of the parameter space that complement previous work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jardin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0e31e5f7920c6386d5dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2026.110425
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper