PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Muscles0 citationsOpen Access

Respiratory Cycle Influence on Lumbosacral Muscle Function: A Tensiomyographic Analysis

View Full Paper
ATAnthony B. TrombettaWHWilliam J. HanneyAAAbigail W. Anderson

Key Points

  • This study investigates how the respiratory cycle influences the contractile properties of lumbosacral muscles using tensiomyography.
  • Thirty healthy young adults underwent TMG assessment of erector spinae and latissimus dorsi at four lung volumes.
  • Respiratory phases were guided by visual cues.
  • Paired-samples t-tests were used to compare TMG parameters across respiratory conditions.
  • Significant differences in muscle displacement, half-relaxation time, and sustain time for erector spinae between end-tidal inspiratory and expiratory volumes (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Differences observed between end-tidal inspiratory volume and total lung capacity (p ≤ 0.05).
  • No significant differences were found for latissimus dorsi (p ≥ 0.12).

Abstract

Background: Tensiomyography (TMG) offers a noninvasive means of evaluating skeletal muscle contractile properties, including muscle displacement (Dm), delay time (Td), contraction time (Tc), half-relaxation time (Tr), and sustain time (Ts). When applied to lumbosacral musculature, interpretation may be influenced by changes in muscle stiffness that occur across the respiratory cycle. Understanding these fluctuations is essential for improving measurement consistency and data interpretation. Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (mean ± SD age = 21.07 ± 1.55 years) underwent TMG assessment of the erector spinae (ES) and latissimus dorsi (LD) at four distinct lung volumes: end-tidal inspiratory volume (ETIV), end-tidal expiratory volume (ETEV), total lung capacity (TLC), and residual volume (RV). Visual cues were used to guide participants’ respiratory phases. Paired-samples t-tests compared TMG parameters across respiratory conditions. Results: For the ES, significant differences were observed in Dm, Tr, and Ts between ETIV and ETEV (p ≤ 0.05), ETIV and TLC (p ≤ 0.05), and ETEV and RV (p ≤ 0.05). No statistically significant differences were identified for the LD (p ≥ 0.12). Conclusions: Some erector spinae contractile properties vary across the respiratory cycle, which may affect TMG outcomes. The findings of this research lend belief to the idea that a standardized respiratory phase during data collection may improve the reliability and comparability of TMG measurements involving trunk musculature. Future research could address the negative findings for latissimus dorsi and further determine which muscles require respiratory standardization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trombetta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f1be1e5f7920c63875dehttps://doi.org/10.3390/muscles5020030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper