PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026˜Die œPharmazie1 citationsOpen Access

The association of ABCC3 promoter methylation with clopidogrel response in Chinese ischemic stroke patients

YJYang JieZJZhou Jun-ShanYZYingdong Zhang

Key Result

In Chinese ischemic stroke patients, ABCC3 promoter methylation was inversely correlated with ABCC3 mRNA expression (R = -0.854) but had no significant impact on clopidogrel response (P = 0.358).

Key Points

  • To investigate the relationship between ABCC3 promoter methylation and clopidogrel response in ischemic stroke patients.
  • Enrolled 87 ischemic stroke patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype receiving clopidogrel.
  • Measured maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) using light transmittance aggregometry.
  • Evaluated ABCC3 promoter methylation using pyrosequencing and mRNA expression via qPCR.
  • ABCC3 methylation showed no significant difference across MPA quartiles (P = 0.275).
  • ABCC3 promoter methylation inversely correlated with ABCC3 mRNA expression (R = -0.854, P < 0.001).
  • No significant association between ABCC3 expression and MPA values (R = 0.060, P = 0.582).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=87)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does ABCC3 promoter methylation affect clopidogrel response (maximum platelet aggregation) in Chinese ischemic stroke patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype?

P
Population
87 Chinese ischemic stroke patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype (wild-type homozygotes)
I
Intervention
Clopidogrel 75 mg/day oral for at least 5 days
O
Outcome
Maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and its association with ABCC3 promoter methylation and mRNA expressionsurrogate

ABCC3 promoter methylation inversely correlates with ABCC3 mRNA expression but does not significantly impact maximum platelet aggregation or clopidogrel response in Chinese ischemic stroke patients.

Main Result

Effect estimate: R 0.100

p-value: p=0.358

Limitations

  • Only 1 important region methylation status in ABCC3 gene promoter was determined to assess the impact on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel
  • The number of patients with ischemic stroke was relatively small
  • only 1 important region methylation status in ABCC3 gene promoter was determined
  • the number of patients with ischemic stroke was relatively small

Abstract

Multidrug resistance protein 3 (MRP3), encoded by ABCC3, is an ATP-dependent efflux pump mediating the transport of many drugs, implicated in clopidogrel resistance. This study enrolled 87 ischemic stroke patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype, who received clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for at least 5 days before discharge. The maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) to assess platelet function. Whole blood samples were obtained to evaluate the ABCC3 promoter methylation and mRNA expression of ABCC3. Pyrosequencing was carried out to investigate ABCC3 methylation and ABCC3 mRNA expression was evaluated by qPCR. The ABCC3 methylation was neither significantly different among the four MPA quartile groups (P = 0.275) nor independently associated with MPA values (R = 0.100, P = 0.358). However, the ABCC3 promoter methylation status in 87 clinical samples from patients correlated inversely with the expression of ABCC3 (R = - 0.854, P < 0.001). In addition, the ABCC3 expression was neither significantly different among the four quartile groups (P = 0.499) nor independently associated with MPA values (R = 0.060, P = 0.582). ABCC3 promoter methylation does not seem to exhibit any impact on MPA and clopidogrel response at all.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jie et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Ischemic stroke (n=87). Clopidogrel was evaluated on Association of ABCC3 promoter methylation with maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) (R 0.100, p=0.358). In Chinese ischemic stroke patients, ABCC3 promoter methylation was inversely correlated with ABCC3 mRNA expression (R = -0.854) but had no significant impact on clopidogrel response (P = 0.358).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f1dc1e5f7920c63877bdhttps://doi.org/10.31083/ph.2014.4603
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper