PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citations

Teaching Others, Reflecting Self: Does Educating Patients Impact Students' Own Plaque Control?

View Full Paper
KJKatja JungLDLukas DübgenCGCarolina Ganss

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate if teaching patients about oral hygiene affects dental students' own plaque control.
  • Retrospective study analyzing intraoral scans of 30 first-year dental students.
  • Students guided patients through an Oral Care Programme including hands-on training.
  • Plaque coverage was quantified at baseline and follow-up using planimetric methods.
  • Mean plaque coverage decreased from 14.6% at baseline to 13.1% at follow-up (p=0.025).
  • Strong correlation in plaque percentages between the two time points (r=0.690, p<0.001).
  • Cluster analysis revealed three distinct plaque-control profiles among students.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective exploratory study investigated whether instructing patients in oral hygiene influences dental students' own hygiene effectiveness. METHODS: Intraoral scans from a full-semester cohort of first-year clinical dental students (n=30) were analysed. At baseline (T0), students performed mutual intraoral scans (CS 3600, Carestream) of disclosed plaque during scanner training. During the semester, they guided their own patients through an Oral Care Programme (OCP) including 3D plaque visualisation and hands-on oral hygiene training. At follow-up (T1), students repeated mutual disclosed-plaque scans. Plaque coverage (P%) was quantified planimetrically on oral (i.e. lingual and palatal) and vestibular (i.e. buccal and labial) surfaces from T0 and T1 of all teeth. Plaque distribution, areas of loss, gain, and stability were assessed. Unsupervised clustering was performed using P%, gain, loss, stable areas, tooth type, and surface as features. RESULTS: Mean P% decreased from 14.6±4.4 at T0 to 13.1±3.7 at T1 (p=0.025), but the magnitude of change was small; P% correlated strongly between time points (r=0.690, p<0.001), indicating largely stable individual plaque-control profiles. Cluster analysis identified three patterns: (1) overall intermediate P%, predominantly on oral surfaces, (2) high overall P%, especially on vestibular molars and premolars, and (3) consistently low P%. Overall, plaque distribution and the spatiotemporal behaviour of plaque areas remained largely persistent. CONCLUSION: Students showed only small reductions in plaque coverage over one semester, while inter-individual patterns remained stable. Cluster-specific trajectories highlight heterogeneity in plaque-control profiles and may help identify the tooth surfaces and regions where targeted feedback may be most effective. Future curricula should emphasise self-reflection, personalised feedback, and practical skills training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f443e8967e944ac5566f37https://doi.org/10.1159/000552192
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital plaque monitoring: An evaluation of different intraoral scanners2024 · 16 citations
  2. 2Cross-cultural differences of self-reported oral health behaviour in Japanese and Finnish dental students2000 · 115 citations
  3. 3Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 1322020 · 126 citations
  4. 4Learning by Preparing‐to‐Teach and Teaching: A Meta‐Analysis2018 · 87 citations
  5. 5Physicians’ health practices strongly influence patient health practices2009 · 233 citations