PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Social perceptions of carnivores across the globe – a literature review

View Full Paper
ANAmy NewsomJLJorge LozanoBMBerta Martín-López

Key Points

  • This review aims to understand how socio-economic, actor-related, and species-related factors influence perceptions of carnivores.
  • Reviewed 146 scientific publications on human-carnivore relations.
  • Coded variable associations as positive, negative, not significant, or mixed.
  • Conducted descriptive analysis comparing associations between regions and carnivore families.
  • Found stronger differences in perceptions based on geographic regions than on carnivore families.
  • Personal beliefs and socio-economic factors significantly influence views on carnivores.
  • Identified key areas for improving human-carnivore relations, such as reconnecting humans to nature.

Abstract

To explore the factors underpinning human–carnivore relations, we reviewed 146 scientific publications recording associations of 34 socio-economic, actor-related, and species-related variables with people’s views on the beneficial and detrimental contributions of carnivorous terrestrial mammals to people. The associations with respective variables were coded as positive, negative, not significant, or mixed. They were then compared between geographic regions and carnivore families in a descriptive analysis and tested for significant differences among regions and carnivore families. The results indicate a pattern of associations that differs more strongly between regions than between carnivore families. This suggests that personal and societal aspects such as individuals’ personal beliefs and socio-economic situation have a stronger impact on their view of carnivores than animals’ biological characteristics. Consequently, we identify leverage point realms to improve human–carnivore relations, in particular re-connecting humans to nature and re-structuring institutions to improve carnivore management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Newsom et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44488967e944ac55677ddhttps://doi.org/10.48548/pubdata-3439
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mapping human‐carnivore coexistence: approaches to integrating anthropogenic influences on carnivore distribution and connectivity modelling2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Communities’ perception towards carnivore conservation in the human-modified Woze-Degena landscape of southern Ethiopia2026
  3. 3Pastoralist views and positions on coexistence with large carnivores. An overview from conflict areas across Europe2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Toward a Synthetic Theory of Tolerance for Carnivores: Learning from a Half-Century of Research on Attitudes Toward Wolves2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Predictions & perceptions: A social-ecological analysis of human-carnivore conflict in Botswana2024 · 7 citations