PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the impact of debt overhang on public investment and economic growth in Nigeria

DADiekola I. AdewuyiOAOyınlola M. AkinyedeTATaofeek Sola Afolabi

Key Points

  • This study examines how debt overhang affects public investment and economic growth in Nigeria.
  • Utilized Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) analysis with annual time-series data from 1981 to 2024.
  • Focused on public investment growth and economic growth as dependent variables, with debt overhang as the independent variable.
  • Included control variables such as interest rate, exchange rate, and inflation rate.
  • A unit increase in debt overhang leads to a 0.744-unit increase in public investment (β = 0.744, p < 0.05).
  • A unit increase in debt overhang results in a 0.153-unit decrease in economic growth (β = -0.153, p < 0.05).
  • Findings suggest Nigeria is in an 'efficiency trap' where debt-financed investment doesn't yield corresponding economic growth.

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractThis study assesses the impact of debt overhang on Nigeria's public investment and economic growth. The paper utilized the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) with annual time-series data from 1981 to 2024 and Myers' debt overhang, fiscal sustainability, and crowding-out effect theories. Public investment growth and economic growth rate were dependent variables, while debt overhang was independent. The control variables included interest rate, exchange rate, and inflation rate. The two models demonstrated a long-term cointegration connection. The results demonstrate a paradox which has practical implications because debt overhang produces statistically significant effects which show opposite results through its impact on both dependent variables.. Specifically, a unit increase in debt overhang is associated with a 0.744-unit increase in public investment (β = 0.744, p lt; 0.05) and a 0.153-unit decrease in economic growth (β = –0.153, p lt; 0.05). The findings support the efficiency trap hypothesis by determining that debt accumulation leads to increased investment but does not produce matching economic growth due to inefficient resource allocation in debt financing. In the short run, debt overhang negatively affects both variables, with the error correction term confirming rapid adjustment to equilibrium. Therefore, Nigeria is operating in an “efficiency trap.” The debt used to finance investment does not translate into economic growth due to poor project selection, resource misallocation, and inefficient project implementation. The null hypotheses for both models were of no significant effect and were rejected. We recommend that policymakers prioritize project appraisal methods and ensure that borrowed funds are directed toward quality investments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adewuyi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affea01https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(2).2026.02
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper