PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Dutch Three-Domain Disgust Scale (TDDS): Structural Validity, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Associations across Two Large Samples

View Full Paper
ABAnn De BuckLPLieven Pauwels

Key Points

  • This research aims to validate the Dutch Three-Domain Disgust Scale and examine its measurement invariance and nomological associations.
  • Performed confirmatory factor analyses on two large samples (Study 1: n=991; Study 2: n=1806) to support three-factor structure of disgust
  • Assessed measurement invariance across sex and domain-specific loadings
  • Examined construct and criterion validity by analyzing associations with related psychological factors.
  • The three-factor structure of the TDDS (pathogen, sexual, moral disgust) was statistically supported.
  • Women exhibited higher latent levels of sexual disgust compared to men, with sex differences noted in other domains being smaller.
  • Construct validity demonstrated strong associations: sexual disgust linked with pair bonding, moral disgust negatively associated with Low Morality, and pathogen disgust related to social factors.

Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive validation of the Dutch Three-Domain Disgust Scale (TDDS) across two large samples (Study 1: n = 991; Study 2: n = 1806). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the theorized three factor structure, pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust, with domain-specific loadings and acceptable global fit. Measurement invariance across sex was fully supported in Study 2 and approximately supported in Study 1, indicating largely comparable measurement across men and women. Women showed higher latent levels of sexual disgust, whereas sex differences in pathogen and moral disgust were smaller and sample dependent. Construct validity was supported through theoretically coherent associations: sexual disgust was robustly linked to pair bonding; moral disgust was substantially negatively associated with Low Morality; and pathogen disgust showed selective associations, including consistent positive links with Low Morality and weaker, sample dependent relations with Outgroup Avoidance. Criterion validity was partly supported: predictors of Low Morality were stable across studies, whereas predictions of Outgroup Avoidance were less consistent. Overall, the Dutch TDDS emerges as a reliable and valid instrument capturing domain specific disgust sensitivity relevant to moral, social, and intergroup processes in Dutch speaking populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affea5ahttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6cgys_v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper