PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026Universa Medicina0 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning models for predicting 48-hour mortality in acute intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke

IKIntan KemaladinaSSSyahrul SyahrulTATaufik Fuadi Abidin

Key Points

  • The aim was to develop a machine learning-based model to predict 48-hour mortality in acute intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study using secondary data from 657 patients with acute ICH.
  • Extracted clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiological variables from medical records with data preprocessing.
  • Evaluated three supervised algorithms – Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gaussian Naïve Bayes – using stratified 5-fold cross-validation.
  • Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy of 84.77%, F1-score of 84.63%, and AUC of 80.51.
  • Random Forest demonstrated high sensitivity of 93.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.9% for predicting >48-hour survival.
  • Naïve Bayes had the best performance for ≤24-hour mortality with sensitivity of 85.4% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.7%.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDIdentifying patients with intracerebral hemorrhagic (ICH) at high risk of mortality is crucial for timely intervention. Machine learning (ML) offers novel methodologies for precise predictive models for ICH. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an ML-based predictive model for 48-hour mortality in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. METHODSA cross-sectional study was conducted using secondary data from 657 patients diagnosed with acute ICH. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables were extracted from medical records. Data preprocessing included cleaning, normalization, and class balancing using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Three supervised algorithms—Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gaussian Naïve Bayes—were developed and evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. RESULTSRandom Forest achieved the best overall performance for predicting 48-hour mortality, with an accuracy of 84.77%, F1-score of 84.63%, and AUC of 80.51, outperforming Decision Tree (AUC 61.12) and Gaussian Naïve Bayes (AUC 82.94). Random Forest most accurately identified >48-hour survival, with high sensitivity (93.5%) and PPV (92.9%), while Naïve Bayes provided the most reliable positive classification for this category (PPV 99.0; specificity 94.2%). For ≤24-hour mortality, Naïve Bayes showed the best detection performance (sensitivity 85.4%; NPV 98.7%). CONCLUSIONSMachine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, enables reliable prediction of 48-hour mortality in patients with acute ICH using basic clinical and radiological data available at admission. The model offers practical potential for early risk stratification in emergency and critical care settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kemaladina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f593f271405d493affeca7https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2026.v45.13-26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage2026
  2. 2Predicting time-to-event outcomes in critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning2026
  3. 3Machine learning for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit2024 · 14 citations
  4. 4Machine Learning‐Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2026
  5. 5Retracted: A Pre-Hospital Prediction Tool for Stroke Type Utilising Machine Learning Techniques2024