PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

The proportion of people with primary affective disorders presenting to early intervention services: systematic review and meta-analysis.

View Full Paper
ACAna CatalánSSSamuel SwidzinskiRMRobert A McCutcheon

Key Points

  • This research aimed to clarify the prevalence of affective psychoses in early intervention services for psychosis.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of affective psychoses at early intervention services.
  • Performed meta-regressions to examine the impact of urbanicity, national income, and geographical region on prevalence rates.
  • Analyzed data from a total of 79 studies for comprehensive insights.
  • Affective psychoses were found in 40.3% to 50.7% of cases presenting to early intervention services (95% CI).
  • Prevalence of affective psychoses was notably lower in Asia compared to North America and Europe.
  • Higher urbanicity correlated with an increased prevalence of affective psychoses.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with affective psychotic disorders often face diagnostic delays and presentations are under-recognised at first contact with early intervention services (EIS). Despite their clinical significance, most research and service models for first-episode psychosis (FEP) have focused on non-affective psychoses. AIMS: We sought to clarify the relative prevalence of affective psychoses in EIS. METHOD: -statistics. Meta-regressions examined potential moderators, including urbanicity, national income level and geographical region. RESULTS: = 79; 95% CI 40.3-50.7). Meta-regression analyses identified that affective psychoses were less common in Asia and more common in North America compared with Europe. Higher urbanicity was also associated with increased prevalence. Associations with national income level (NIL) were limited by small subgroup sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Affective psychotic disorders constitute a meaningful subgroup within EIS. This suggests better screening, targeted treatments and adaptive service models of care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Catalán et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5947e71405d493afff404https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2026.10602
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper