PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Specifying the Cardio-Respiratory Patterns During Fast-Paced Breathing.

View Full Paper
MIMaša IskraSLSylvain LabordeTPTasha Poppa

Key Result

Fast-paced breathing at 35 and 55 cycles/min reduced heart rate variability, while 55 CPM significantly increased cardiac contractility compared to spontaneous and slower paced breathing.

Key Points

  • The aim is to quantify heart rate variability and cardiac contractility changes during fast-paced breathing compared to spontaneous and paced breathing.
  • Healthy participants (N=38) performed breathing exercises at varying cycles per minute for 2.5 minutes.
  • Electrocardiography and impedance cardiography collected physiological data during exercises.
  • Heart rate variability was measured using RMSSD, and cardiac contractility was assessed via pre-ejection period (PEP).
  • FPB at 35 and 55 CPM resulted in decreased heart rate variability.
  • Only FPB at 55 CPM showed a significant increase in cardiac contractility, suggesting enhanced stimulation.
  • Breathing discomfort rose with increased frequency, peaking at a moderate level at 55 CPM.

Structured PICO

Does fast-paced breathing alter heart rate variability and cardiac contractility compared to spontaneous and slower paced breathing in healthy participants?

P
Population
38 healthy, physically active participants
I
Intervention
Fast-paced breathing (FPB) at 35 and 55 cycles/min (CPM) for 2.5 min
C
Comparator
Spontaneous and paced breathing (6 and 15 CPM) for 2.5 min
O
Outcome
Changes in heart rate variability (indexed through RMSSD) and cardiac contractility (indexed through pre-ejection period)surrogate

Fast-paced breathing at 55 cycles/min reduces heart rate variability and increases cardiac contractility, indicating pronounced physiological stimulation.

Abstract

Fast-paced breathing (FPB) has emerged as a technique to purposefully increase physiological activation to facilitate motor-cognitive performance. Empirical evidence of prominent physiological processes associated with FPB, cardiac changes however, remain scarce. To address this gap, the present study sought to systematically quantify the changes in heart rate variability and cardiac contractility during FPB at 35 and 55 cycles/min (CPM), compared to spontaneous and paced breathing (6 and 15 CPM), while accounting for breathing discomfort. Healthy, physically active participants (N = 38) performed each breathing exercise for 2.5 min, with electrocardiography and impedance cardiography signals recorded throughout. Heart rate variability was indexed through RMSSD, and the pre-ejection period (PEP) served as an index of cardiac contractility. Results showed that FPB at 35 and 55 CPM led to reduced heart rate variability, whereas only the latter condition elicited a significant increase in cardiac contractility, suggesting a more pronounced stimulation. Breathing discomfort level increased as the breathing frequency deviated from the spontaneous range, reaching a moderate level at 55 CPM. These findings elucidate the frequency dependence in reciprocal and independent cardiac patterns, informing conceptual models of paced breathing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iskra et al. (2026) studied Healthy, physically active participants (n=38). Fast-paced breathing (FPB) at 35 and 55 cycles/min vs. Spontaneous and paced breathing (6 and 15 CPM) was evaluated on Heart rate variability (RMSSD) and cardiac contractility (PEP). Fast-paced breathing at 35 and 55 cycles/min reduced heart rate variability, while 55 CPM significantly increased cardiac contractility compared to spontaneous and slower paced breathing.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5947e71405d493afff583https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper