PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Deep learning-based denoising in cardiac CT: effects on image quality, calcium scoring interchangeability, and reporting workflow

DWDaniel WesslingJMJan MagnusJBJan M. Brendel

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effects of deep learning-based denoising on image quality, calcium scoring interchangeability, and workflow efficiency in cardiac CT.
  • Retrospective analysis of 100 patients with CAC and CCTA scans
  • Comparison of deep learning denoising and iterative reconstruction using a semiquantitative scoring system
  • Objective metrics for image quality such as CT number stability and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured
  • DLD improved overall image quality compared to IR (p < 0.001) with better noise and contrast-to-noise ratio
  • Agatston scores were significantly higher in IR prior to manual correction (p < 0.001), but not significantly different after correction (p ≥ 0.158)
  • DLD reduced manual correction time (p < 0.001)

Abstract

Objectives Ischemic heart disease is a major global health burden requiring timely diagnosis. Although coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) are valuable tools, image noise can distort assessment. Deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithms may enhance quality, yet their impact on cardiac CT workflows remains unclear. This study evaluated DLD effects on CAC and CCTA image quality, clinical interchangeability, and workflow efficiency compared with iterative reconstruction (IR). Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with CAC and CCTA scans from the same CT scanner was performed. IR and DLD reconstructions yielded 400 datasets, rated by two radiologists using a semiquantitative scoring system. Objective metrics (CT number stability, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio) were measured. Clinical interchangeability and Workflow efficiency were evaluated. Results DLD showed significantly higher overall image quality than IR ( p 0.001), while preserving CT attenuation and improving noise and CNR. Although cardiac age classifications did not differ between reconstruction methods, Agatston scores were significantly higher in IR before manual correction ( p 0.001. After manual correction, Agatston scores were not significantly different between IR and DLD ( p ≥ 0.158), supporting clinical comparability of the derived clinical metrics between the two approaches. DLD also reduced manual correction time ( p 0.001). Conclusions The investigated DLD algorithm improves image quality and radiological workflows thus potentially enhancing overall patient care. Key limitations include the retrospective single-center design and inherent subjectivity in image-quality evaluation; therefore, findings should be confirmed in prospective studies with more objective measures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wessling et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5618071d4f1bdfc609fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2026.1764357
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper