PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

A systematic seminar-based model improves learning and research competence in an immunology graduate course: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study

View Full Paper
JQJing QinJQJing QinWSWengang Song

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a seminar-based teaching model in improving learning outcomes and research competencies in immunology education.
  • Quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control group; 38 control and 30 intervention students.
  • Control group received traditional lecture-based teaching; experimental group received seminar model.
  • Outcomes assessed included academic performance, self-reported competency gains, and qualitative feedback.
  • Experimental group had a significantly higher mean final score (93.83 ± 1.97) compared to control (90.84 ± 4.35), p < 0.001.
  • Significant improvements in literature reading, academic expression, and teamwork skills reported by the experimental group.
  • Qualitative feedback indicated enhanced engagement, higher-order thinking, and innovation.

Abstract

BackgroundMedical immunology, a bridging discipline between basic and clinical medicine, is characterized by rapid knowledge updates, multidisciplinary integration, and fast clinical translation. The course Advances in Immunology aims to bridge the gap between classical theory and cutting-edge exploration, requiring innovative pedagogy to foster critical thinking and research readiness among graduate students. However, traditional lecture-based teaching often fail to develop higher-order competencies. This study designed and applied a systematic seminar-based teaching model for the course Advances in Immunology and evaluated its outcomes.MethodsA quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group was adopted. Participants were immunology master’s students at Shandong First Medical University (2022 and 2023 cohort: n = 38, control; 2024 and 2025 cohort: n = 30, intervention). The control group received traditional lecture-based teaching, while the experimental group received the seminar teaching model. Outcomes included academic performance, self-reported competency gains, and qualitative feedback.ResultsQuantitative results showed that the mean final score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (93.83 ± 1.97 vs. 90.84 ± 4.35, p < 0.001). Questionnaire results indicated significant improvements in literature reading, academic expression, and teamwork skills in the experimental group. Qualitative findings suggested enhanced engagement, higher-order thinking and innovative capacity.ConclusionThe seminar-based teaching model successfully enhanced academic performance and core research competencies in immunology graduate education, offering a replicable framework for advanced medical courses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6478071d4f1bdfc6e51https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1787256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper