PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique1 citationsOpen Access

Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Revision Surgery for Recurrent Cervical Degenerative Pathology: A Technical Report

KSKwan-Su SongPKPius Kim

Key Points

  • To outline a minimally invasive surgical technique for revision of recurrent cervical pathology while preserving motion.
  • Five patients underwent UBE-assisted posterior cervical revision for various cervical pathologies.
  • Techniques applied included inclinatory foraminotomy or unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression.
  • Outcomes were assessed with VAS scores, motor strength evaluation, radiography, and modified MacNab criteria.
  • All surgeries were completed without open conversion or the necessity for fusion.
  • Neck pain VAS scores improved from 4-8 preoperatively to 0-1 postoperatively at 1 year.
  • Arm pain VAS scores showed a reduction from 7-9 to 0-2, with improvement in motor function for all affected patients.

Abstract

Objective: Revision surgery for recurrent cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy after posterior decompression is technically challenging because of epidural adhesions, altered anatomy, and the risk of postoperative instability. Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is commonly performed, it sacrifices segmental motion and is associated with fusion-related morbidity. This technical report describes the surgical technique and early clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) posterior cervical revision as a motion-preserving alternative.Methods: Five patients underwent UBE-assisted posterior cervical revision surgery for recurrent cervical disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, or central canal stenosis. Procedures included inclinatory foraminotomy or unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression, depending on pathology. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, motor strength assessment, radiographic evaluation, and modified MacNab criteria. All patients were followed for at least 1 year.Results: All procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery or the need for fusion. Adequate neural decompression was achieved in all cases, with preservation of facet joint integrity and cervical alignment. Neck pain VAS scores improved from 4–8 preoperatively to 0–1 at 1 year postoperatively, while arm pain VAS scores improved from 7–9 to 0–2. Motor weakness improved in all patients who presented with preoperative deficits. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed during the follow-up period.Conclusion: UBE-assisted posterior cervical revision surgery appears to be a feasible and effective minimally invasive option for selected patients. This technique allows sufficient decompression while preserving cervical motion and avoiding fusion-related morbidity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Song et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836aa3ed186a739980d5bhttps://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2025.02810
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper