PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026EPJ Web of Conferences0 citationsOpen Access

Forward Kinematic Analysis and Simulation of Reconfigurable Four-Wheeled Omni-Drive Mobile Robot

DPDhaval PanchalMCMihir ChauhanVMVishal Mehta

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and analyze a forward kinematic model for reconfigurable four-wheeled omni-drive robots.
  • Developed models named Rhombus and Swastik with adjustable parameters.
  • Conducted simulations in MATLAB for six motion types across eleven configurations.
  • Monitored trajectories, velocities, and angular orientations over a 10-second duration.
  • Rhombus model showed a stable resultant velocity of 50 mm/s across all configurations.
  • Swastik model achieved higher velocities, with 111 mm/s for forward left turn and 86 mm/s for forward rotation.
  • Demonstrated a trade-off between stability and maneuverability, with significant impacts from geometric reconfiguration on angular movements.

Abstract

Robots that are flexible, reconfigurable and universally adaptable and capable of performing various tasks in constrained and dynamic workspaces are in high demand. In this research general forward kinematic model has been developed and analyzed for two different geometric structures of reconfigurable four wheeled omni drive mobile robot. These two structures named Rhombus and Swastik model can reconfigure their geometry by varying design parameters as per task need. Six predefined motion M1 to M6 named forward, rotation, forward left turn, forward right turn, left yaw and right yaw motion are considered for performance evaluation for eleven different configurations C1 to C11 of each model. A MATLAB based simulation is carried out using time step of 0.1 second for 10 seconds duration, to evaluate the robots' trajectories, velocities, and angular orientations. Simulation result demonstrates, rhombus model has high stability and uniform motion due to symmetric wheel placements. It shows a nearly constant resultant velocity of 50 mm/s almost for all configurations and motions. In contrast, Swastik model has higher resultant velocity of 111 mm/s for M3 and 86 mm/s for M2 due to wheel offset arrangements which enhances maneuverability. The results show a clear trade-off between stability versus maneuverability across two models. In addition, geometric reconfiguration has minimal effect on linear motion but significant impact on turning and angular motions. The proposed model comes up with validated forward kinematic modelling and simulation framework for reconfigurable four wheeled omni drive mobile robot. It enhances the performance of geometry-depending robots.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Panchal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836aa3ed186a739980e04https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636701001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Omni Wheel Arrangement Evaluation Method Using Velocity Moments2023 · 15 citations
  2. 2Trajectory Tracking of an Omni-Directional Wheeled Mobile Robot Using a Model Predictive Control Strategy2018 · 162 citations
  3. 3Deformation Mechanism and Design of an Omni-directional Mobile Reconfigurable Robot2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Development of Omni-Wheeled Mobile Robot Based-on Inverse Kinematics and Odometry2019 · 23 citations
  5. 5Industry 4.0 Concept: Background and Overview2017 · 1,010 citations