PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Frontiers in Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Work meaning in medicine: a comparative investigation across training stages

NKNicole KovaksYLYuliya Lipshits‐BrazilerSASima Amram‐Vaknin

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to explore how work orientations impact work-related wellbeing among different medical training stages.
  • Cross-sectional survey administered to 198 participants including physicians, residents, and clinical-year medical students.
  • Utilized a work orientations questionnaire and demographic survey, alongside work-related wellbeing indicators.
  • Group differences assessed using analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and Pearson correlations for associations.
  • Calling emerged as the most endorsed work orientation across all groups.
  • Medical students reported higher calling than residents and higher career/social embeddedness than physicians.
  • Calling showed consistent associations with work-related wellbeing, particularly among residents and students.

Abstract

Introduction Work orientations (i.e., the meaning individuals attribute to the purpose of their work) are established predictors of work-related wellbeing in the general population. This investigation examined an expanded model of work orientations (i.e., calling, job, career, social embeddedness, and busyness) in the medical profession. It compared physicians, residents, and clinical-year medical students across six indicators for work-related wellbeing: person-environment fit, work satisfaction, work engagement, burnout, turnover intentions, and commitment to the profession. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to 198 participants from Israel, including physicians, residents, and clinical-year medical students. Measures included a work orientations questionnaire, indicators of work-related wellbeing, and a demographic questionnaire. Group differences were examined using analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Pearson correlations were computed to assess associations between work orientations and work-related wellbeing indicators. Results Calling was the most strongly endorsed orientation across all groups. Medical students reported higher calling than residents, and higher career and social embeddedness than physicians. Calling was most consistently associated with work-related wellbeing across the stages of the medical profession, whereas the associations of social embeddedness and busyness with wellbeing were most notable among residents and students. Discussion These findings underscore the developmental nature of the associations between work orientations and work-related wellbeing in medicine, offering implications for both theory and practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kovaks et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836aa3ed186a739980e6dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1780736
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Work and Environmental Factors on Job Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study for Sustainable Work2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Workplace Factors That Affect Medical Educator Well-being: Insights From A National Survey of Osteopathic Medical Faculty2025
  3. 3The work environment and hospitalist work well‐being and burnout2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Predictors of work satisfaction among physicians2003 · 257 citations
  5. 5Work Environment Factors and Subjective Well-Being Among Healthcare Professionals: A Structural Equation Modeling Study with Mediation Analysis2026