PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Bioengineering & Translational Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of multi‐electrode electrostatic precipitation during intraperitoneal aerosolized drug delivery: Insights from a large animal model

View Full Paper
MRMohammad Rahimi‐GorjiRGRosalie GhesquièreYLYiwen Long

Key Points

  • This research investigates whether electrostatic precipitation enhances aerosolized drug delivery for peritoneal metastasis treatment.
  • Large animal model using female pigs with randomized groups receiving either IPADD alone or combined with ESP.
  • Tissue samples collected from abdominal wall and small bowel after treatment with methylene blue solution.
  • Evaluation of aerosol distribution via semiquantitative scoring and tissue penetration on cryosections.
  • ESP improved methylene blue distribution in regions away from the nebulizer (p<0.05).
  • Tissue penetration in abdominal wall and small bowel samples was significantly enhanced with ESP.
  • No increase in systemic exposure or tissue damage was noted.

Abstract

Abstract Intraperitoneal aerosolized drug delivery (IPADD) has emerged as a promising local treatment approach for peritoneal metastasis (PM). However, its effectiveness is currently limited by uneven aerosol distribution and restricted tumor tissue penetration. The use of electrostatic precipitation (ESP) exerts an electric force, which may enhance aerosol distribution and tissue penetration. A methylene blue (MB) solution was delivered intraperitoneally as an aerosol during laparoscopy in female pigs. Animals were randomized to receive either IPADD alone or IPADD combined with ESP. Tissue samples were taken from the ventral and lateral abdominal wall and from the small bowel. Aerosol distribution was evaluated using semiquantitative scoring of MB staining. Tissue penetration was measured on cryosections. Systemic resorption was assessed via serial blood sampling. Compared to IPADD alone, ESP clearly improved MB distribution, specifically in regions away from the nebulizer, and appreciably enhanced the tissue penetration in abdominal wall and small bowel samples. Sequenced activation of the three electrodes produced the most pronounced effects. ESP did not increase systemic exposure, and no tissue damage was observed. In this large animal model, multi‐electrode ESP safely enhanced aerosol distribution and tissue penetration during IPADD, showing potential to improve treatment in patients with PM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahimi‐Gorji et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836d93ed186a739980f89https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Performance of different nebulizers in clinical use for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis2017 · 9,053 citations
  3. 3Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study2014 · 32 citations
  4. 4Impact of maximal cytoreductive surgery plus regional heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on outcome of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: Results of the GYMSSA trial2014 · 232 citations
  5. 5Treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: A systematic review of survival, mortality, and morbidity2011 · 273 citations