PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026European Spine Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Augmented reality assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: feasible and effective workflow with intraoperative video

View Full Paper
IYIyan YounusRORafael Garcia de OliveiraPLPatricia Lipson

Key Points

  • To assess the feasibility and efficacy of augmented reality in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
  • Analyzed consecutive patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing MIS-TLIF with AR navigation.
  • Collected demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes over a specified period.
  • Utilized headset-mounted AR for surgical navigation in the operative workflow.
  • Mean operative time was 129 minutes, with fluoroscopy time averaging 41 seconds.
  • 60% of patients reported improvement in back and leg pain post-surgery.
  • Safety profile was acceptable with no persistent neurological deficits noticed during the follow-up.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article and accompanying video provide a comprehensive workflow for incorporating headset-mounted augmented reality (AR) navigation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a single level MIS-TLIF with AR navigation for degenerative spondylolisthesis were analyzed between January 2023-2025. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The AR workflow features a wireless headset with projection of intraoperative navigation in the surgical field. MIS pedicle screw placement, facetectomy, disc preparation, and contralateral arthrodesis are carried out percutaneously though single line of sight using navigated instruments. RESULT: , and mean CCI score was 2.1±1.5. The mean operative time from incision to closure for the entire cohort was 129±28 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 41±12 s, EBL was 51±33 ml, and the mean length of stay was 1.9±1.8 days. Two (9%) patients required reoperation at a mean 5 weeks. The AR protocol was safely implemented in all cases with improvement in back and leg pain and no persistent neurologic deficits at mean 163 day follow up. CONCLUSION: Headset-mounted AR navigation is a feasible and reproducible tool to provide visualization for MIS TLIF that can be successfully integrated into surgical workflow. In this initial case series, its use was associated with an acceptable early safety profile and consistent perioperative outcomes. However, given the limitations of this study, including its retrospective design and lack of a comparator cohort, further prospective and comparative studies are necessary to evaluate its impact on surgical efficiency, accuracy, and clinical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Younus et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530caehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09972-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper