PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

From Spatial Heterogeneity to Real-Time Monitoring: Liquid Biopsy for Genomic Profiling and MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma

View Full Paper
FRFizza RasheedYMYafeng MaTBT. Becker

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the clinical utility of liquid biopsy in multiple myeloma for assessing genomic profiles and minimal residual disease.
  • Examined liquid biopsy components like circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells.
  • Discussed their roles in capturing mutational profiles and treatment resistance mechanisms.
  • Analyzed current limitations such as assay sensitivity and standardization.
  • Highlighted the potential of liquid biopsy for early relapse detection in multiple myeloma.
  • Identified spatial heterogeneity as a crucial factor in genomic profiling.
  • Emphasized the importance of prospective validation to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells that is characterized by a complex and spatially heterogeneous genomic landscape. Despite this complexity, clinical monitoring remains largely dependent on localized bone marrow (BM) assessments. This dependence creates a significant diagnostic gap, as the primary monitoring tools fail to account for the spatial and temporal heterogeneity that drives tumor relapse. Liquid biopsy can serve as an adjunctive approach in assessing the pan-clonal landscape in MM through the molecular profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In this review, we examine the clinical utility of liquid biopsy components in capturing mutational profiles, clonal evolution, treatment resistance mechanisms, and minimal residual disease (MRD), including early detection of relapse and extramedullary progression. We will further discuss current limitations, including variability in assay sensitivity, lack of standardization, and the need for prospective validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rasheed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530db3https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091439
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Liquid Biopsies as Non-Invasive Tools for Mutation Profiling in Multiple Myeloma: Application Potential, Challenges, and Opportunities2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Novel method of minimal residual disease testing in myeloma: Liquid biopsies to enumerate and 3D telomere-profiling of circulating tumor cells2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Isolation and profiling of single circulating tumor cells in myeloma: a new workflow for liquid biopsies2026
  4. 4Liquid biopsy for non-invasive molecular characterization and measurable residual disease analysis in multiple myeloma2025
  5. 5Liquid Biopsy as a Means of Assessing Prognosis and Identifying Novel Risk Factors in Multiple Myeloma2025 · 1 citations