PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Association of OQLQ Scores with Treatment Acceptance in Orthognathic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study

View Full Paper
LSL. SerésMMMarietta MucsiGPGellért Perényi

Key Points

  • Evaluate the association between OQLQ scores and treatment acceptance for orthognathic surgery.
  • Cross-sectional study design involving adult patients offered orthognathic surgery
  • Participants completed the Hungarian version of the OQLQ
  • Outcomes assessed using nonparametric tests and Firth penalized logistic regression adjusted for age and sex
  • 133 patients participated, with 107 proceeding to surgery
  • Median total OQLQ scores were higher in the surgery group than the decline group, not statistically significant
  • Only the facial aesthetics domain showed a statistically significant association with treatment acceptance

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether patients’ decisions to undergo orthodontic–surgical treatment for dentofacial deformity are associated with Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) scores, and to identify which domains show the strongest relationship with treatment acceptance. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) who were offered orthognathic surgery by the same orthodontic specialist team completed the Hungarian version of the OQLQ. The primary outcome was whether the patient proceeded with surgery following consultation (yes/no). The questionnaire comprises 22 items across four domains, from which domain-specific and total scores (range: 0–88) were calculated. Given the non-normal distribution and group imbalance, comparisons between groups were performed using nonparametric tests, and associations were further evaluated using Firth penalized logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results: A total of 133 patients were included, of whom 107 proceeded with surgery and 26 did not proceed. Median total OQLQ scores were higher in the surgery group than in the decline group (40.0 IQR: 27.0–52.0 vs. 31.5 16.0–52.5), although this difference was not statistically significant. In adjusted analyses, the total OQLQ score was not independently associated with treatment acceptance. Among the domains, only facial aesthetics showed a modest association that reached statistical significance (OR per 1-point increase: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.002–1.22). Conclusions: In this single-center cross-sectional study, OQLQ scores showed only a limited association with treatment acceptance. The observed effect was modest, and only the facial aesthetics domain demonstrated a statistically significant relationship, with a confidence interval close to unity, indicating a borderline and potentially unstable association. These findings suggest that patient-reported quality of life alone is insufficient to explain treatment decisions. The OQLQ may be useful as a supportive tool in clinical consultation, particularly for identifying concerns related to facial appearance, but should not be used as a standalone predictor of whether patients proceed with surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Serés et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530e3ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Orthognathic virtual treatment planning for functional esthetic results2019 · 31 citations
  2. 2Definition and Prevalence of Dentofacial Deformities2013 · 34 citations
  3. 3What Are Orthognathic Patients' Expectations of Treatment Outcome—A Qualitative Study2012 · 44 citations
  4. 4Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile1997 · 2,739 citations
  5. 5Reasons for refusing orthognathic surgery by orthodontic patients: a cross-sectional survey2022 · 7 citations