PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026The Journal of Economic History0 citations

Strikes and Machines: Investments in the Norwegian Inter-War-Period

View Full Paper
AKAndreas KotsadamMRMagnus B. RasmussenKMKalle Moene

Key Points

  • This research examines how strike threats influence firms' investment strategies in Norway during the interwar period.
  • Developed a theoretical model on the impact of strike threats.
  • Analyzed newly digitized data from 3,141 industrial conflicts and collective agreements.
  • Investigated the role of capital-intensive versus labor-intensive methods.
  • Found that strikes generally lead firms to favor less capital-intensive technologies.
  • The effect is stronger in branch or national-level conflicts.
  • Identified shifts in power dynamics between employers and workers as significant.

Abstract

To what extent do strike threats prompt firms to adopt capital-intensive methods to deter strikes or labor-intensive strategies to maintain flexibility during work stoppages? We introduce a theoretical model that demonstrates how threats of industrial action influence capital investments through relative factor prices and the power dynamics between workers and employers. Using newly digitized data from 3,141 industrial conflicts and collective agreements in Norway during the interwar period, our findings indicate that strikes generally drive firms toward less capital-intensive technologies. This trend is particularly pronounced in conflicts resolved at the branch or national level, where strike threats may appear more exogenous to firms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kotsadam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8eac04f884e66b53104chttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050725101095
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper