PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Deconstructing the Formation and Dependency Relationships of Dual “Basic–Applied” Networks in China’s Low-Carbon Technology Innovation

View Full Paper
LLLiu LiuJZJun Zhu

Key Points

  • To analyze the formation mechanisms and dependency relationships within low-carbon technology innovation networks in China.
  • Constructed dual networks for low-carbon basic and applied research using patent and publication data.
  • Employed Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) and Multilevel Exponential Random Graph Models (MERGMs) for analysis.
  • Introduced NK model to assess network formation factors and dependencies.
  • Identified significant differences in formation factors for basic and applied research networks.
  • Revealed asymmetric dependency relationships between basic research network and applied research network.

Abstract

Low-carbon technology innovation serves as the core driver for multiple countries striving to achieve their dual-carbon goals. Therefore, building efficient low-carbon technology innovation networks and accelerating low-carbon technological innovation have become key focuses of academic research. Leveraging patent and publication data, this study constructs dual networks for low-carbon basic and applied research. It employs Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) and Multilevel Exponential Random Graph Models (MERGMs) to explain the different formation factors and dependency relationships within dual networks. Building on this, this study introduces the NK model to analyze the order of effects of these network formation factors and dependencies. The findings reveal the following: (1) The formation factors of dual low-carbon innovation networks differ significantly. For the basic research network (BRN), the key formation factors—in order of effect—are collaboration stability, transitive closure, partner addition, the Matthew effect, and knowledge siphoning. For the applied research network (ARN), the key formation factors—in order of effect—are historical collaboration, collaboration stability, partner addition, cognitive proximity, and knowledge siphoning. (2) The BRN and ARN exhibit an asymmetric dependency. The dependence of the BRN on the ARN is manifested as structural symbiosis, whereas the ARN, guided by the BRN, demonstrates the transmission of collaborative relationships. This study elucidates the complex formation mechanisms and dependency patterns of low-carbon technology innovation networks, providing a theoretical foundation and decision-making support for the differentiated governance of network structures and the optimized allocation of innovation resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8ef304f884e66b531512https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identifying Critical Risks in Low-Carbon Innovation Network Ecosystem: Interdependent Structure and Propagation Dynamics2025
  2. 2The spatial network structure of energy-saving and carbon-reducing technological innovation in China2026
  3. 3Evolutionary characteristics and driving factors of innovative cooperation networks in the field of CCUS technology in China2025
  4. 4Dynamic Evolution and Driving Mechanism of a Multi-Agent Green Technology Cooperation Innovation Network: Empirical Evidence Based on Exponential Random Graph Model2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Network dynamics of inter-firm innovation in China’s digital economy: a two-layer network perspective2025 · 8 citations