This study aims to evaluate the methodology sections of draft articles prepared by master's students participating in the TÜBİTAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye) 2237 project titled "Research Methods Training II for Graduate (master's) Students' Studying in the Field of Educational Sciences" in four groups during the course period, based on expert opinions. The study employed a qualitative research model, with participants comprising 21 graduate students' who attended the relevant course in June 2024. The data were collected through rubrics based on observations and document analysis and were analyzed using content analysis. According to the findings, the majority of participants rated themselves below average in research methods prior to the course. In addition, the majority of participants again stated that their level of competence in independently writing the methods section of a study was quite low. At the end of the training, it was observed that the participants' knowledge, skills, and competence in research methods had increased significantly compared to their pre-course levels. The review and evaluation revealed that the methods sections of the draft articles prepared by the groups were generally adequate but needed improvement in some areas. It was determined that the participants' work was generally appropriate in terms of method or design selection, and that the procedures and explanations regarding data collection tools, data analysis, validity, and reliability were sufficient. However, some deficiencies or errors were identified in terms of sample determination and the selection of appropriate statistical techniques.
Özdemir et al. (2026) studied this question.