PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy1 citations

Policy Surveillance of Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Laws to Reduce Injury among Healthcare Workers

View Full Paper
AMAdam Fred MoskowitzEDEvelyn DoranMRMarizen Ramirez

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of state-level Safe Patient Handling and Mobility policies in reducing injuries among healthcare workers.
  • Utilized legal epidemiology policy surveillance methods to analyze SPHM policies at the state level in the US.
  • Recorded scope of coverage and enforceable elements of SPHM laws since 2006.
  • Examined differences in policy effectiveness between higher and lower acuity healthcare settings.
  • Identified that eleven states enacted SPHM policies since 2006 while two states repealed them.
  • Noted a preference for administrative controls over engineering controls in these policies.
  • Highlighted the common inclusion of mandatory training and SPHM committees as interventions.

Abstract

Safe Patient Handling and Mobility (SPHM) programs address the tasks associated with lifting, moving, transferring, and/or assisting patients in healthcare-related settings. Manual patient handling tasks are a major source of occupational injury among healthcare workers, often resulting in harm to the back and musculoskeletal system. We systematically used legal epidemiology policy surveillance methods to capture and evaluate all state-level SPHM policies for US healthcare settings, recording their scope of coverage and enforceable elements. Since 2006, eleven states have enacted SPHM policies to reduce healthcare worker injuries. Two states repealed them later. These policies tended to target higher acuity settings rather than lower acuity or long-term residential settings and favor administrative controls over engineering controls. Specifically, the most common policy interventions included mandatory training and SPHM committees, while interventions targeting SPHM equipment availability or use were less common. Researchers, labor unions, and policymakers should prioritize engineering controls that impact physical workplace safety when crafting SPHM policy interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moskowitz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa980604f884e66b531c4ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/10482911261447546
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper