PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026American Journal of Art and Design0 citationsOpen Access

Plagiarism Detection in GAN-Generated Abstract Art: A Multi-Modal Semantic and Compositional Approach

View Full Paper
BCByungkil Choi

Key Points

  • To create a framework for detecting plagiarism in GAN-generated abstract art using multi-modal analysis.
  • Developed a pipeline combining perceptual, compositional, and semantic cues.
  • Utilized metrics such as MS-SSIM, color-distribution distances, and Gram-matrix statistics.
  • Normalized and fused multiple evaluation channels into a calibrated similarity score.
  • The method outperforms isolated metrics in distinguishing between derivation and independent creation.
  • Provided channel-level explanations along with uncertainty bounds for generated similarity scores.

Abstract

This paper presents an interpretable multi-modal framework for screening potential plagiarism in GAN-generated abstract art. Because abstract works often resemble one another through palette, texture, rhythm, and massing rather than recognizable objects, single-metric or text-oriented plagiarism tools are insufficient. The proposed pipeline combines perceptual cues (MS-SSIM, color-distribution distances, Gram-matrix texture statistics, and edge topology), compositional cues (symmetry, balance, saliency spread, orientation entropy, and palette harmony), and semantic cues from CLIP and BLIP. Each channel is normalized, fused into a calibrated similarity score, and reported with uncertainty bounds and channel-level explanations. Using representative WikiArt-anchored cases and GAN-generated counterparts, the framework distinguishes probable derivation, stylistic influence, and independent creation more reliably than any isolated metric. The revised manuscript adds a consolidated related-work matrix, documented case provenance for A1–A5, illustrative output dossiers, and visual summaries of the comparative results. The method is intended as a transparent decision-support tool for scholarly, curatorial, and legal review rather than an automated adjudicator.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Byungkil Choi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa980604f884e66b531d18https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20261102.11
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Computational Approach to Edge Detection1986 · 29,477 citations
  2. 2Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy1991 · 5,234 citations
  3. 3The Contingent Object of Contemporary Art2003 · 212 citations
  4. 4Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity2004 · 57,912 citations
  5. 5Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells1987 · 3,294 citations