PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Regulation & Governance2 citations

Doing Business in Zones of Legal Risk: Patterns of Corporate Involvement in Atrocity Crimes Since World War II

View Full Paper
SKSusanne KarstedtWHWim HuismanABAnnika van Baar

Key Points

  • The research aims to examine corporate involvement in atrocity crimes in legal risk zones.
  • Conducted an empirical study of 205 cases in 36 countries
  • Explored involvement patterns based on industry type and partners in crimes
  • Identified six risk profiles of corporate involvement
  • Revealed significant patterns in corporate crime related to human rights violations
  • Showcased the relationship between corporate characteristics and risks of involvement in violence
  • Found that conditions in legal risk zones influence corporate complicity in war crimes and genocide

Abstract

ABSTRACT Involvement of corporations in international crimes and conflict atrocities, such as crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide, are neither isolated events nor uncommon. Importantly, corporate involvement in atrocity crimes is shaped by conditions in “zones of legal risk” (International Commission of Jurists), where gross human rights violations, atrocity crimes and extreme violence are pervasive. In this context, corporations become complicit in the most serious state crimes. The empirical study of 205 historical and contemporary cases across all global regions in a total of 36 countries explores patterns of involvement starting from the conceptual framework developed by the International Commission of Jurists. We identify six “risk profiles” of involvement defined by industry type, partners in such crimes, and the type of involvement and contribution to the crimes. Our results showcase the relationship between corporate characteristics and risks of involvement in serious violence for different risk profiles across space and time. Starting from a legal conceptual framework, we discuss how these results contribute to criminological theories of corporate crime, as well as to regulation theory and practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karstedt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa983604f884e66b5320achttps://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper