PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Experience Sustaining: A Systems Framework for Adaptive Inference in Human–AI Interaction Toward Efficient, Ethical, and Deep Human–AI Co-Evolution

View Full Paper
AAAlexis Arellano

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance human-AI co-evolution by preserving cognitive engagement during interactions.
  • Proposes a framework named Experience Sustaining (ES) for interaction design.
  • Introduces Semantic-Cognitive State Continuity as the central variable.
  • Defines four-dimensional interaction space with computable proxies.
  • Utilizes agent-based simulations with 200 conversations for testing the framework.
  • Demonstrates up to 100% collapse rates under Baseline in open-ended tasks.
  • Collapse rates plausibly reduced to 0% under ES-full conditions.
  • Confirms structural differences in SCSC collapse trajectories across task types.

Abstract

Current large language models optimize for task completion, systematically eroding the semantic-cognitive continuity required for open-ended inquiry, ethical deliberation, and long-horizon learning. We propose Experience Sustaining (ES), a runtime interaction framework designed to preserve Semantic-Cognitive State Continuity (SCSC) — the coupled system property that keeps the human cognitively engaged, the interaction semantically diverse, and the conversation resistant to premature resolution. The framework formalizes SCSC as the primary conserved variable; a four-dimensional interaction space (Novelty, Coherence, Cognitive Effort, Directionality — N-C-E-D) with computable proxies; a discrete intra-regime stability metric (Index of Sustained Experience, ISE) ; four collapse conditions; and a model-agnostic runtime policy layer deployable on existing LLMs without retraining. This version introduces the Differential Collapse Postulate: the hypothesis that distinct task types produce structurally different SCSC collapse trajectories. In high-stakes deliberation tasks, collapse is driven exclusively by Novelty Exhaustion while human effort remains elevated. In divergent creative tasks, Effort Abandonment precedes Novelty Exhaustion by approximately two turns. In structured learning tasks, Novelty Exhaustion precedes Effort Abandonment by approximately three turns. Each regime requires a different primary corrective intervention. An agent-based simulation model (n=200 conversations per condition; seed=42; 15 turns; three policy conditions: Baseline, ES-lite, ES-full; four task types) generates results consistent with the postulate. Collapse rates of 58-100% under Baseline in open-ended tasks are plausibly reduced to 0% under ES-full. All results are proof-of-concept under simulated conditions; human-subject validation is required. Supplementary materials include the simulation model (esₛimulationᵥ3. py, Python/numpy, fully reproducible) and complete results (simulationᵣesultsᵥ3. json).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alexis Arellano (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa986a04f884e66b532199https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20025437
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper